IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v105y2021ics0264837721001393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community-led regeneration practice in Ghalam Gudeh District, Bandar Anzali, Iran: A participatory action research (PAR) Project

Author

Listed:
  • Pourzakarya, Maryam
  • Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad

Abstract

Community-led regeneration has become a key issue in sustaining urban redevelopment and improving the quality-of-life. This paper explores the bottom-up regeneration practice through ten-step participatory planning by the engagement of the local community and other possible stakeholders in the Ghalam Gudeh neighbourhood, Iran. Based on the methods of qualitative study and participatory action research, the paper mostly aims to understand the contribution of community-led regeneration strategies to a socially deprived area similar to the empirical study by conducting interviews, workshops and meetings. The strategies included empowerment, capacity-building, co-experience of creative activities and grouping of residents with the support of facilitators and local authorities. Consequently, it has led to the establishment of a Neighbourhood Development Centre as well as modelling the neighbourhood vision and a participatory regeneration framework. The results indicated that based on trust-building and awareness-raising, residents tended to get engaged in the regeneration process despite contradictory attitudes towards community-led regeneration project. With the involvement and empowerment of participants, it is possible to develop an integrated vision aimed at transforming the economic, socio-cultural, physical, and environmental circumstances of the area to increase the level of quality of living.

Suggested Citation

  • Pourzakarya, Maryam & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2021. "Community-led regeneration practice in Ghalam Gudeh District, Bandar Anzali, Iran: A participatory action research (PAR) Project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:105:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001393
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721001393
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chenhan Jiang & Yiqi Xiao & Hongyi Cao, 2020. "Co-Creating for Locality and Sustainability: Design-Driven Community Regeneration Strategy in Shanghai’s Old Residential Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Pourzakarya, Maryam & Fadaei Nezhad Bahramjerdi, Somayeh, 2019. "Towards developing a cultural and creative quarter: Culture-led regeneration of the historical district of Rasht Great Bazaar, Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Heike Doering, 2014. "Competing Visions of Community: Empowerment and Abandonment in the Governance of Coalfield Regeneration," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1003-1018, May.
    4. Mia Arp Fallov, 2010. "Community Capacity Building as the Route to Inclusion in Neighbourhood Regeneration?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 789-804, December.
    5. Federico Savini, 2011. "The Endowment of Community Participation: Institutional Settings in Two Urban Regeneration Projects," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 949-968, September.
    6. M. Gregory Lloyd, 2002. "Urban regeneration and community development in Scotland: converging agendas for action," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(3), pages 147-154.
    7. Michael Ball, 2004. "Co‐operation with the community in property‐led urban regeneration," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 119-142, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aftabi, Pegah & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2023. "Developing a decision-making framework within the management of historical cities: Towards integrated conservation and development of the Roudaki neighbourhood," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Kaijian Li & Ruopeng Huang & Guiwen Liu & Asheem Shrestha & Xinyue Fu, 2022. "Social Capital in Neighbourhood Renewal: A Holistic and State of the Art Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gu, Zhonghua & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2021. "Framing social sustainability and justice claims in urban regeneration: A comparative analysis of two cases in Guangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Jane Zheng & Xiaohua Zheng, 2022. "Does Public Participation Matter to Planning? Urban Sculpture Reception in the Context of Elite-Led Planning in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Federico Savini, 2016. "Self-Organization and Urban Development: Disaggregating the City-Region, Deconstructing Urbanity in Amsterdam," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1152-1169, November.
    4. James Fraser & Joshua Theodore Bazuin & George Hornberger, 2016. "The privatization of neighborhood governance and the production of urban space," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(5), pages 844-870, May.
    5. Yongjun Shin, 2014. "Reconstructing Urban Politics with a Bourdieusian Framework: The Case of Local Low-Income Housing Policy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1833-1848, September.
    6. Maria Rita Pinto & Serena Viola & Anna Onesti & Francesca Ciampa, 2020. "Artists Residencies, Challenges and Opportunities for Communities’ Empowerment and Heritage Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Catherine Macdonald, 2017. "The role of participation in sustainable community development programmes in the extractives industries," WIDER Working Paper Series 028, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Qing Yang & Yan Song & Yinying Cai, 2020. "Blending Bottom-Up and Top-Down Urban Village Redevelopment Modes: Comparing Multidimensional Welfare Changes of Resettled Households in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Ghadiri, Mohaddese & Sarrafi, Mozaffar, 2022. "Integrating support groups, an effective approach to regenerate historic neighborhoods of Iran Case study: Oudlajan Neighborhood, Tehran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Mehrdad Chahardowli & Hassan Sajadzadeh & Farshid Aram & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "Survey of Sustainable Regeneration of Historic and Cultural Cores of Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Edwin H. W. Chan & Grace K. L. Lee, 2008. "Contribution of urban design to economic sustainability of urban renewal projects in Hong Kong," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(6), pages 353-364.
    13. Bowen Zhang & Weimin Guo & Zhaolian Xing & Ren Zhou, 2022. "Current Situation and Sustainable Renewal Strategies of Public Space in Chinese Old Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    14. KC Ho & Vincent Chua, 2018. "The neighbourhood roots of social cohesion: Notes on an exceptional case of Singapore," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(2), pages 290-312, March.
    15. Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2021. "Perception Difference and Conflicts of Stakeholders in the Urban Regeneration Project: A Case Study of Nanluoguxiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Esin Özdemir & Ayda Eraydin, 2017. "Fragmentation in Urban Movements: The Role of Urban Planning Processes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 727-748, September.
    17. Bart Neuts & Senne Kimps & Jan van der Borg, 2021. "Resident Support for Tourism Development: Application of a Simplified Resident Empowerment through Tourism Scale on Developing Destinations in Flanders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Simona Mina, 2012. "Lobbying and Advocacy in Assuring Participative Democracy in Romania," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 85-92, April.
    20. Kaijian Li & Ruopeng Huang & Guiwen Liu & Asheem Shrestha & Xinyue Fu, 2022. "Social Capital in Neighbourhood Renewal: A Holistic and State of the Art Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:105:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.