Urban regeneration and community development in Scotland: converging agendas for action
Devolution is having a marked effect on policy design and delivery in Scotland. In particular, it is possible to identify a focus on a distinctive Scottish agenda, and in the priorities for action. Intervention is directed in particular at the community, in terms of its general well-being, and in promoting positive discrimination for disadvantaged areas and groups. Community planning and Social Inclusion Partnerships are the vehicles for this approach. Significantly, the theme of leadership runs through these measures, and this may yet enable a more stable programme for community development to be sustained into the future. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment.
Volume (Year): 10 (2002)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Peter Taylor & Ivan Turok & Annette Hastings, 2001.
"Competitive Bidding in Urban Regeneration: Stimulus or Disillusionment for the Losers?,"
Environment and Planning C,
, vol. 19(1), pages 45-63, February.
- Peter Taylor & Ivan Turok & Annette Hastings, 2001. "Competitive bidding in urban regeneration: stimulus or disillusionment for the losers?," Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 19(1), pages 45-63, February.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:10:y:2002:i:3:p:147-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.