IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Urban regeneration and community development in Scotland: converging agendas for action

Listed author(s):
  • M. Gregory Lloyd

    (The Geddes Centre for Planning Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK)

Registered author(s):

    Devolution is having a marked effect on policy design and delivery in Scotland. In particular, it is possible to identify a focus on a distinctive Scottish agenda, and in the priorities for action. Intervention is directed in particular at the community, in terms of its general well-being, and in promoting positive discrimination for disadvantaged areas and groups. Community planning and Social Inclusion Partnerships are the vehicles for this approach. Significantly, the theme of leadership runs through these measures, and this may yet enable a more stable programme for community development to be sustained into the future. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. in its journal Sustainable Development.

    Volume (Year): 10 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 147-154

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:10:y:2002:i:3:p:147-154
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.193
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Peter Taylor & Ivan Turok & Annette Hastings, 2001. "Competitive Bidding in Urban Regeneration: Stimulus or Disillusionment for the Losers?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(1), pages 45-63, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:10:y:2002:i:3:p:147-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.