IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v81y2023ics030142072300123x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring anthropogenic phosphorus cycles to promote resource recovery and circularity in Morocco

Author

Listed:
  • Houssini, Khaoula
  • Geng, Yong
  • Liu, Jing-Yu
  • Zeng, Xianlai
  • Hohl, Simon V.

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is essential for plant growth and food production. We examine anthropogenic phosphorus use in Morocco for the year 2018. Results show that a total of 11,654 kt P was extracted in 2018, of which 82.14% was exported and the remaining 17.86% was applied in the local industries and stored as reserves. The most considerable P loss to the environment came from the mining and manufacturing stages (494 kt P/y). In 2018, 90% of the total P waste originated from mining and manufacturing stages and the recovery rate was 55% (727 kt P/y), mainly from mining waste disposal facilities. The remaining waste was dumped into the environment (603 kt P/y) due to the lack of efficient P recovery technologies. Consequently, it is crucial to enhance P recovery and recycling so that future phosphorus resource circularity can be improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Houssini, Khaoula & Geng, Yong & Liu, Jing-Yu & Zeng, Xianlai & Hohl, Simon V., 2023. "Measuring anthropogenic phosphorus cycles to promote resource recovery and circularity in Morocco," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s030142072300123x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142072300123X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cooper, James & Lombardi, Rachel & Boardman, David & Carliell-Marquet, Cynthia, 2011. "The future distribution and production of global phosphate rock reserves," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 78-86.
    2. Oshokoya, P.O. & Tetteh, M.N.M., 2018. "Mine-of-the-future: How is Africa prepared from a mineral and mining engineering education perspective?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 125-133.
    3. Senthilkumar, Kalimuthu & Mollier, Alain & Delmas, Magalie & Pellerin, Sylvain & Nesme, Thomas, 2014. "Phosphorus recovery and recycling from waste: An appraisal based on a French case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 97-108.
    4. Michael C. Mew & Gerald Steiner & Bernhard Geissler, 2018. "Phosphorus Supply Chain—Scientific, Technical, and Economic Foundations: A Transdisciplinary Orientation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Dana Cordell & Stuart White, 2011. "Peak Phosphorus: Clarifying the Key Issues of a Vigorous Debate about Long-Term Phosphorus Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Grames, Johanna & Zoboli, Ottavia & Laner, David & Rechberger, Helmut & Zessner, Matthias & Sánchez-Romero, Miguel & Prskawetz, Alexia, 2019. "Understanding feedbacks between economic decisions and the phosphorus resource cycle: A general equilibrium model including material flows," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 311-347.
    7. Aladejare, Samson Adeniyi, 2022. "Natural resource rents, globalisation and environmental degradation: New insight from 5 richest African economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Jahanger, Atif & Usman, Muhammad & Murshed, Muntasir & Mahmood, Haider & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, 2022. "The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Cooper, James & Carliell-Marquet, Cynthia, 2013. "A substance flow analysis of phosphorus in the UK food production and consumption system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 82-100.
    10. Egle, L. & Zoboli, O. & Thaler, S. & Rechberger, H. & Zessner, M., 2014. "The Austrian P budget as a basis for resource optimization," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 152-162.
    11. Christian Huggel & Ivo Wallimann-Helmer & Dáithí Stone & Wolfgang Cramer, 2016. "Reconciling justice and attribution research to advance climate policy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 901-908, October.
    12. Seyhan, Demet, 2009. "Country-scale phosphorus balancing as a base for resources conservation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 698-709.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theobald, Tim F.H. & Schipper, Mark & Kern, Jürgen, 2016. "Phosphorus flows in Berlin-Brandenburg, a regional flow analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Jedelhauser, Michael & Binder, Claudia R., 2015. "Losses and efficiencies of phosphorus on a national level – A comparison of European substance flow analyses," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PB), pages 294-310.
    3. Klinglmair, Manfred & Lemming, Camilla & Jensen, Lars Stoumann & Rechberger, Helmut & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard & Scheutz, Charlotte, 2015. "Phosphorus in Denmark: National and regional anthropogenic flows," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PB), pages 311-324.
    4. Chowdhury, Rubel Biswas & Moore, Graham A. & Weatherley, Anthony J. & Arora, Meenakshi, 2014. "A review of recent substance flow analyses of phosphorus to identify priority management areas at different geographical scales," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 213-228.
    5. Cooper, James & Carliell-Marquet, Cynthia, 2013. "A substance flow analysis of phosphorus in the UK food production and consumption system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 82-100.
    6. Coppens, Joeri & Meers, Erik & Boon, Nico & Buysse, Jeroen & Vlaeminck, Siegfried E., 2016. "Follow the N and P road: High-resolution nutrient flow analysis of the Flanders region as precursor for sustainable resource management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 9-21.
    7. Klinglmair, Manfred & Zoboli, Ottavia & Laner, David & Rechberger, Helmut & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard & Scheutz, Charlotte, 2016. "The effect of data structure and model choices on MFA results: A comparison of phosphorus balances for Denmark and Austria," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 166-175.
    8. Prasad, Penny & Pullar, David & Pratt, Steven, 2014. "Facilitating access to the algal economy: Mapping waste resources to identify suitable locations for algal farms in Queensland," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 47-52.
    9. Maaß, Oliver & Grundmann, Philipp & von Bock und Polach, Carlotta, 2014. "Added-value from innovative value chains by establishing nutrient cycles via struvite," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 126-136.
    10. Walan, Petter & Davidsson, Simon & Johansson, Sheshti & Höök, Mikael, 2014. "Phosphate rock production and depletion: Regional disaggregated modeling and global implications," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 178-187.
    11. Sadeq Damrah & Elma Satrovic & Mohamad Atyeh & Fekri Ali Shawtari, 2022. "Employing the Panel Quantile Regression Approach to Examine the Role of Natural Resources in Achieving Environmental Sustainability: Does Globalization Create Some Difference?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Klinglmair, Manfred & Vadenbo, Carl & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard & Scheutz, Charlotte, 2017. "An MFA-based optimization model for increased resource efficiency: Phosphorus flows in Denmark," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Huang, Haiping & Huang, Baolian & Sun, Aijun, 2023. "How do mineral resources influence eco-sustainability in China? Dynamic role of renewable energy and green finance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    14. Lanre Ibrahim, Ridwan & Bello Ajide, Kazeem & Usman, Muhammad & Kousar, Rakhshanda, 2022. "Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 244-256.
    15. Muhammad Usman & Atif Jahanger & Magdalena Radulescu & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente, 2022. "Do Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, and Environmental-Related Technologies Asymmetrically Reduce Ecological Footprint? Evidence from Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Kataki, Sampriti & West, Helen & Clarke, Michèle & Baruah, D.C., 2016. "Phosphorus recovery as struvite: Recent concerns for use of seed, alternative Mg source, nitrogen conservation and fertilizer potential," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 142-156.
    17. Ansari, Mohd Arshad, 2022. "Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: A comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Atif Jahanger & Muhammad Usman & Daniel Balsalobre‐Lorente, 2022. "Linking institutional quality to environmental sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1749-1765, December.
    19. Aladejare, Samson Adeniyi, 2023. "Economic prosperity, asymmetric natural resource income, and ecological demands in resource-reliant economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Daniel Reißmann & Daniela Thrän & Alberto Bezama, 2018. "Key Development Factors of Hydrothermal Processes in Germany by 2030: A Fuzzy Logic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s030142072300123x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.