Author
Listed:
- Nie, Tengfei
- Song, Bo
- Zhang, Jianghua
Abstract
With the proliferation of e-commerce, there has been a remarkable surge in the volume of products sold online, accompanied by a corresponding increase in product returns. In order to stimulate consumer demand, retailers have adopted various promotional strategies, among which the bundling and add-on sales have emerged as the most prevalent. Nevertheless, there is currently no clearly dominant promotion model considering consumer return behavior. Consequently, we construct a game-theory model that considers product returns in the settings of an online retailer, an insurance company, and a continuum of consumers. Within our model, consumers are confronted with uncertainty regarding their valuations and only ascertain the true value of a purchased product after acquisition. Moreover, retailers must carefully consider the tradeoff between the bundling and add-on models: bundling sales may sell more products, but return products increase; on the other hand, add-on sales offer the advantage of single item returns but may result in a decrease in overall product sales. Our findings yield several noteworthy conclusions warranting further examination. First, add-on product substandard rate (Proportion of add-on products with substandard quality to all add-on products) has a significant influence on the retailer’s choice of sales model. More specifically, when the add-on product substandard rate is lower, retailers will definitely choose bundling sales. Otherwise, the retailer’s choice of sales model depends on both core product price and degree of discount. Second, in bundling sales, the better the match between core product and add-on product, the higher the retailer’s profit. However, in add-on sales, highly matched add-on product may hurt the retailer’s profit. Finally, add-on sales is a better choice for commercial groups that have both sales companies and insurance companies.
Suggested Citation
Nie, Tengfei & Song, Bo & Zhang, Jianghua, 2024.
"Sales pricing models based on returns: Bundling vs. add-on,"
Omega, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:jomega:v:125:y:2024:i:c:s0305048324000057
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2024.103038
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:125:y:2024:i:c:s0305048324000057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.