IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joaced/v65y2023ics0748575123000453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do team-based written or video explanations of course content enhance accounting students’ knowledge, communication, and teamwork skills?

Author

Listed:
  • Pollock, Marchantia
  • Schmulian, Astrid
  • Coetzee, Stephen A.

Abstract

This study explores students’ knowledge, communication, and teamwork skills development when using team-based explanations, in either written or video mode, during an assessment for learning in a competency-based accounting education context. Both modes of team-based explanation, written or video, seem to enhance conceptual and transfer knowledge among weaker and moderate-performing students. When viewed as an interconnected and indivisible process, the video explanation mode appears more beneficial for top-performing students’ conceptual knowledge development than the written explanation mode. The team-based video explanation mode also appears to be the preferred method for developing teamwork skills, while both modes are perceived as beneficial for developing communication skills. Overall, the video mode of a team-based explanation assessment for learning appears to be the favored choice, as it facilitates whole-class knowledge development while also allowing greater opportunities for students’ teamwork and communication skills development in a competency-based education context.

Suggested Citation

  • Pollock, Marchantia & Schmulian, Astrid & Coetzee, Stephen A., 2023. "Do team-based written or video explanations of course content enhance accounting students’ knowledge, communication, and teamwork skills?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:65:y:2023:i:c:s0748575123000453
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575123000453
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:65:y:2023:i:c:s0748575123000453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-accounting-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.