IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v99y2025ics0047235225001084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring people in prison's perceptions of correctional officer procedural justice

Author

Listed:
  • Baker, Thomas
  • Ray, James V.
  • Nobles, Matt R.

Abstract

The measurement of procedural justice has received some meaningful examination, but research has yet to demonstrate measurement invariance, item invariance, or the measurement properties of people in prison's perceptions of correctional officer procedural justice. Demonstrating measurement invariance provides evidence that items included in a proposed construct are responded to similarly by different groups of people. In this study we provide evidence of measurement invariance of a five-item measure of prison procedural justice across sex, race/ethnicity, age, time in prison, and security level. However, given data limitations, some questions remain regarding the applicability of the proposed measure across sex and security level, specifically females incarcerated in maximum-security facilities. As applications of procedural justice move beyond policing, it is important we understand how to reliably measure procedural justice in other criminal justice contexts and have measures empirically shown to be reliable and valid for future research. This study offers researchers with such a construct in the form of a short, reliable measure of people in prison's perceptions of correctional officer procedural justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Baker, Thomas & Ray, James V. & Nobles, Matt R., 2025. "Measuring people in prison's perceptions of correctional officer procedural justice," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001084
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001084
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.