IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Domestic violence and criminal justice training needs of social services workers

Listed author(s):
  • Payne, Brian K.
Registered author(s):

    Domestic violence is a multifaceted problem that requires various agencies to work together to serve victims. Among other agencies that are involved in this collaborative effort, criminal justice officials must work with social services workers to ensure that cases are handled effectively. At the root of this collaborative effort, it is natural to question whether various parties have the knowledge needed to effectively respond to specific cases of domestic violence. In this study, attention was given to whether social workers possessed enough knowledge about various aspects of domestic violence, including information required to process domestic violence cases in the criminal justice system. In all, 186 social services worker supervisors in the Commonwealth of Virginia were asked to rate the level of knowledge they believed social services workers had regarding specific domestic violence topics with the level of knowledge workers they believed social workers needed regarding each domestic violence topic. Findings suggested that social services workers might have more problems dealing with the interpersonal nature of domestic violence cases than they do with the legal issues. At the same time, the supervisors suggested the workers knew less about specific legal options than they needed to know. Based on this, the authors suggest changes in training for all human services workers, including criminal justice officials and social workers.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(08)00023-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Journal of Criminal Justice.

    Volume (Year): 36 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 2 (May)
    Pages: 190-197

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:36:y::i:2:p:190-197
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as
    in new window


    1. Morgan, Etta & Johnson, Ida & Sigler, Robert, 2006. "Public definitions and endorsement of the criminalization of elder abuse," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 275-283.
    2. Feder, Lynette, 1996. "Police handling of domestic calls: The importance of offender's presence in the arrest decision," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 481-490.
    3. Johnson, Ida M. & Sigler, Robert T., 1995. "Community attitudes: A study of definitions and punishment of spouse abusers and child abusers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 477-487.
    4. Johnson, Ida M. & Sigler, Robert T., 2000. "Public perceptions The stability of the public's endorsements of the definition and criminalization of the abuse of women," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 165-179.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:36:y::i:2:p:190-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.