IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v36y2008i3p252-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The sexual stratification hypothesis revisited: Testing assumptions about simple versus aggravated rape

Author

Listed:
  • Tellis, Katharine M.
  • Spohn, Cassia C.

Abstract

Previous research testing the sexual stratification hypothesis has included only African American and White victims and suspects. This study also included Hispanic victims and suspects. Using data on all sexual assaults reported to the San Diego Police from 1995 to 2002, the analysis focused on the effects of the racial/ethnic composition of the victim/offender dyad, the relationship between victim and offender, and type of rape on three sexual assault case outcomes: whether the victim declined prosecution, whether the police unfounded the crime, and whether the district attorney filed charges. A secondary analysis employed the liberation hypothesis to test whether the effect of race was confined to simple rape. Results indicated that the racial composition of the victim/offender dyad was largely insignificant in determining case outcomes, but that the relationship between victim and offender and whether the suspect and victim were under the influence of alcohol or drugs had strong effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Tellis, Katharine M. & Spohn, Cassia C., 2008. "The sexual stratification hypothesis revisited: Testing assumptions about simple versus aggravated rape," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 252-261, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:252-261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(08)00047-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kingsnorth, Rodney & Lopez, John & Wentworth, Jennifer & Cummings, Debra, 1998. "Adult sexual assault: The role of racial/ethnic composition in prosecution and sentencing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 359-371, September.
    2. Bouffard, Jeffrey A., 2000. "Predicting type of sexual assault case closure from victim, suspect, and case characteristics," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 527-542.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lovell, Rachel E. & Klingenstein, Joanna & Du, Jiaxin & Overman, Laura & Sabo, Danielle & Ye, Xinyue & Flannery, Daniel J., 2023. "Using machine learning to assess rape reports: Sentiment analysis detection of officers' “signaling” about victims' credibility," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Ericka Wentz & Kelsey Keimig, 2019. "Arrest and Referral Decisions in Sexual Assault Cases: The Influence of Police Discretion on Case Attrition," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ericka Wentz & Kelsey Keimig, 2019. "Arrest and Referral Decisions in Sexual Assault Cases: The Influence of Police Discretion on Case Attrition," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Crow, Matthew S. & Gertz, Marc, 2008. "Sentencing policy and disparity: Guidelines and the influence of legal and democratic subcultures," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 362-371, August.
    3. Sarah Marx Quintanar, 2011. "Do Driver Decisions in Traffic Court Motivate Police Discrimination in Issuing Speeding Tickets?," Departmental Working Papers 2011-13, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    4. Campbell, Bradley A. & Menaker, Tasha A. & King, William R., 2015. "The determination of victim credibility by adult and juvenile sexual assault investigators," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 29-39.
    5. Franklin, Cortney A. & Fearn, Noelle E., 2008. "Gender, race, and formal court decision-making outcomes: Chivalry/paternalism, conflict theory or gender conflict?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 279-290, July.
    6. Lovell, Rachel E. & Klingenstein, Joanna & Du, Jiaxin & Overman, Laura & Sabo, Danielle & Ye, Xinyue & Flannery, Daniel J., 2023. "Using machine learning to assess rape reports: Sentiment analysis detection of officers' “signaling” about victims' credibility," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Mourtgos, Scott M. & Adams, Ian T. & Mastracci, Sharon H., 2021. "Improving victim engagement and officer response in rape investigations: A longitudinal assessment of a brief training," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. James Meernik, 2003. "Victor's Justice or the Law? Judging And Punishing At The International Criminal Tribunal For The Former Yugoslavia," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(2), pages 140-162, April.
    9. Michael P Anastario & Monica Adhiambo Onyango & Joan Nyanyuki & Karen Naimer & Rachel Muthoga & Susannah Sirkin & Kelle Barrick & Martijn van Hasselt & Wilson Aruasa & Cynthia Kibet & Grace Omollo, 2014. "Time Series Analysis of Sexual Assault Case Characteristics and the 2007–2008 Period of Post-Election Violence in Kenya," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-6, August.
    10. Kristine Eck & Charles Crabtree, 2020. "Gender differences in the prosecution of police assault: Evidence from a natural experiment in Sweden," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Maxwell, Christopher D. & Robinson, Amanda L. & Post, Lori A., 2003. "The impact of race on the adjudication of sexual assault and other violent crimes," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 523-538.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:252-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.