IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v113y2025ics0160289625000704.html

Racial hereditarian research remains unjustified and harmful: A reply to Woodley et al. (2025a, b)

Author

Listed:
  • Bird, Kevin A.
  • Jackson, John P.
  • Winston, Andrew S.

Abstract

In two simultaneously published articles in Intelligence, Woodley et al. (2025a, b) claimed that the RHR literature is very small, lacks impact and influence, and poses no special risks. The articles critiqued Bird, et al. (2024) which presented evidence of ongoing “racial hereditarian research” (RHR) in Psychology, its use by racial extremists, and the assistance of RHR psychologists to racial extremist groups. Woodley et al. (2025 a, b) ignored the evidence in Bird et al. (2024) and the past and present harm caused by long-discredited claims that African genes are associated with lower intelligence and morality. We correct false statements in Woodley et al. (2025a,b) and refute their claims that the application of rigorous standards would “undermine science” and constitutes “censorship.”

Suggested Citation

  • Bird, Kevin A. & Jackson, John P. & Winston, Andrew S., 2025. "Racial hereditarian research remains unjustified and harmful: A reply to Woodley et al. (2025a, b)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0160289625000704
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2025.101967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289625000704
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2025.101967?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca Sear, 2021. "Demography and the rise, apparent fall, and resurgence of eugenics," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(S1), pages 201-220, December.
    2. Luiza-Maria Filimon & Mihaela Ivănescu, 2024. "Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 183-204, March.
    3. Woodley of Menie, Michael A. & Peñaherrera-Aguirre, Mateo & Figueredo, Aurelio-José & Miller, Geoffrey F. & Coyle, Thomas R. & Carl, Noah & Debes, Fróði & Frisby, Craig L. & Léon, Federico R. & Madiso, 2025. "Anti-Mertonian norms undermine the scientific ethos: A critique of Bird, Jackson Jr., and Winston's policy proposals and associated justification," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Brian B Boutwell & Joseph L Nedelec & Bo Winegard & Todd Shackelford & Kevin M Beaver & Michael Vaughn & J C Barnes & John P Wright, 2017. "The prevalence of discrimination across racial groups in contemporary America: Results from a nationally representative sample of adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-8, August.
    5. Genevieve L. Wojcik, 2025. "Eugenics is on the rise again: human geneticists must take a stand," Nature, Nature, vol. 641(8061), pages 37-38, May.
    6. Preetha Mitra, 2022. "Germany in Transition? An Appraisal of Immigration Trends and Identity Debates in the Context of the 2015–2016 Refugee Crisis," International Studies, , vol. 59(2), pages 163-179, April.
    7. Rindermann, Heiner & Becker, David & Coyle, Thomas R., 2020. "Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: Intelligence research, experts' background, controversial issues, and the media," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Gaweda, 2022. "The Gendered Discourses of Illiberal Demographic Policy in Poland and in Russia," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 49-60.
    2. Conching, Andie Kealohi Sato & Thayer, Zaneta, 2019. "Biological pathways for historical trauma to affect health: A conceptual model focusing on epigenetic modifications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 74-82.
    3. Becker, David & Bakhiet, Salaheldin Farah & Alshahomee, Alsedig Abdalgadr & Gadour, Abdelbasit & Elmenfi, Fadil & Essa, Yossry Ahmed Sayed & Dutton, Edward, 2023. "Opinions on intelligence: An Arab perspective," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Van Cauwenberghe, Sofie & Schelfhout, Stijn & Roels, Elisabeth & Heeren, Jordi & De Wachter, Lieve & Duyck, Wouter & Dirix, Nicolas, 2025. "Validating Rules: A non-verbal free fluid intelligence test," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Hisler, Garrett C. & Brenner, Rachel E., 2019. "Does sleep partially mediate the effect of everyday discrimination on future mental and physical health?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 115-123.
    6. Wai, Jonathan & Worrell, Frank C., 2021. "The future of intelligence research and gifted education," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Adrian Furnham, 2023. "Peer nominations as scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 1451-1458, February.
    8. Eby, Margaret R., 2025. "Expertise and the “new science” of eugenics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    9. Barbara Gaweda, 2022. "The Gendered Discourses of Illiberal Demographic Policy in Poland and in Russia," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 49-60.
    10. Woodley of Menie, Michael A. & Peñaherrera-Aguirre, Mateo & Figueredo, Aurelio-José & Miller, Geoffrey F. & Coyle, Thomas R. & Carl, Noah & Debes, Fróði & Frisby, Craig L. & Léon, Federico R. & Madiso, 2025. "Content meta-analysis of a racial hereditarian research “bibliography” reveals minimal support for Bird, Jackson Jr., and Winston's model of “scientific racism”," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Yunju Nam & Eun Young Choi & Cho Rong Won & Hee Yun Lee, 2023. "The role of racial/ethnic discrimination in financial access and material hardship: Findings from Korean immigrants living in the deep south," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 1547-1575, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0160289625000704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.