IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v45y2024i2p183-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Luiza-Maria Filimon
  • Mihaela Ivănescu

Abstract

Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue that, inscribing itself in a long tradition of dog-whistles, the anti-CRT panic is predicated on the idea that the contemporary American society is one devoid of systemic forms of racial discrimination and that by deviating from this premise, a form of reverse discrimination targeting Whites is becoming, in effect, systemic. Using document analysis, this article examines how the anti-CRT rhetoric has translated into institutionalized forms that prohibit the use of alleged CRT practices in educational contexts (K-12 level and colleges) and public service. In this sense, we review a swath of anti-CRT initiatives that were passed between 2021 and 2022 in 15 state legislatures across the US. These bills sought to determine how issues pertaining to race, racism, and discrimination are addressed. We find that this was achieved through a multi-pronged approach that focused on: (1) defining sets of prohibited concepts; (2) creating mechanisms to detect perceived CRT-offenses; and (3) dispensing penalties and sanctions against potential transgressors.

Suggested Citation

  • Luiza-Maria Filimon & Mihaela Ivănescu, 2024. "Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 183-204, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:45:y:2024:i:2:p:183-204
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:45:y:2024:i:2:p:183-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.