IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v53y2024ics1467089524000174.html

Information security risk items and management practices for mobile payment using non-financial-institution service providers: An exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Shaio-Yan
  • Wang, Tawei
  • Huang, Yu-Ting
  • Yeh, Tzu-Ning

Abstract

Mobile payment has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, concerns remain about the information security risk management practices implemented by non-financial-institution mobile payment service providers, such as mobile phone carriers and technology companies, using tokenization systems and encryption mechanisms. Using the modified Delphi method and building on the COBIT 2019 framework, this study explores and suggests how these non-financial-institution mobile payment service providers can consider a more holistic list of information security risk items and their corresponding management practices. We believe the proposed practices will help non-financial-institution mobile payment service providers focus on the valuable aspects of information security risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Shaio-Yan & Wang, Tawei & Huang, Yu-Ting & Yeh, Tzu-Ning, 2024. "Information security risk items and management practices for mobile payment using non-financial-institution service providers: An exploratory study," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:53:y:2024:i:c:s1467089524000174
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089524000174
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sutton, Steve G. & Arnold, Vicky, 2013. "Focus group methods: Using interactive and nominal groups to explore emerging technology-driven phenomena in accounting and information systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 81-88.
    2. Worrell, James L. & Di Gangi, Paul M. & Bush, Ashley A., 2013. "Exploring the use of the Delphi method in accounting information systems research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 193-208.
    3. Hamdaoui, Mekki & Maktouf, Samir, 2020. "Financial reforms and banking system vulnerability: The role of regulatory frameworks," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 184-205.
    4. Michael Chui, 2021. "Money, technology and banking: what lessons can China teach the rest of the world?," BIS Working Papers 947, Bank for International Settlements.
    5. Abhipsa Pal & Tejaswini Herath & Rahul De’ & H. Raghav Rao, 2021. "Is the Convenience Worth the Risk? An Investigation of Mobile Payment Usage," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 941-961, August.
    6. Fiordelisi, Franco & Ricci, Ornella & Stentella Lopes, Francesco Saverio, 2017. "The Unintended Consequences of the Launch of the Single Supervisory Mechanism in Europe," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(6), pages 2809-2836, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iryna Okolelova & Jacob A. Bikker, 2022. "The single supervisory mechanism: Competitive implications for the banking sectors in the euro area," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 1818-1835, April.
    2. Gyoengyi Loranth & Anatoli Segura & Jing Zeng, 2022. "Voluntary support and ring-fencing in cross-border banks," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1373, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    3. Chia-Lee Yang & Benjamin J. C. Yuan & Chi-Yo Huang, 2015. "Key Determinant Derivations for Information Technology Disaster Recovery Site Selection by the Multi-Criterion Decision Making Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-40, May.
    4. Makokha Peter Wanyama & Prof. Peter Keiyoro & Dr. Lydia N. Wambugu, 2020. "Reform Interventions, Participatory Monitoring And Performance Of Agricultural Projects Funded By The World Bank In Trans-Nzoia County, Kenya," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management, IPRJB, vol. 5(1), pages 79-103.
    5. Iryna Okolelova & Jacob A. Bikker, 2022. "The single supervisory mechanism: Competitive implications for the banking sectors in the euro area," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 1818-1835, April.
    6. Saskia Crucke & Adelien Decramer, 2016. "The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    7. Molyneux, Philip & Reghezza, Alessio & Xie, Ru, 2019. "Bank margins and profits in a world of negative rates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Kishore Bhoopalam, A. & van den Berg, R. & Agatz, N.A.H. & Chorus, C.G., 2021. "The long road to automated trucking: Insights from driver focus groups," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2021-003-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Mousa Albashrawi & Amir Zaib Abbasi & Lin Li & Umair Rehman, 2025. "Adoption of Blockchain E-Voting Service: Digital Literacy as a Mediating Mechanism," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1555-1576, August.
    10. Laddawan Kaewkitipong & Charlie Chen & Jiangxue Han & Peter Ractham, 2022. "Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) and Trust Factors for the Continuance Intention of Mobile Payment Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Koetter, Michael & Krause, Thomas & Sfrappini, Eleonora & Tonzer, Lena, 2022. "Completing the European Banking Union: Capital cost consequences for credit providers and corporate borrowers," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    12. Trang H. Dao & Amedeo Pugliese & Joshua Ronen, 2023. "Assessing banks’ resilience: A complementary approach to stress testing using fair values from banks’ financial statements," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(7-8), pages 1206-1239, July.
    13. Saeed Nosratabadi & Gergo Pinter & Amir Mosavi & Sandor Semperger, 2020. "Sustainable Banking; Evaluation of the European Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Myriam García-Olalla & Manuel Luna, 2021. "Market reaction to supranational banking supervision in Europe: Do firm- and country-specific factors matter?," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 947-975, November.
    15. Nuri Altintas & Alessandra Ferrari & Claudia Girardone, 2022. "Do financial reforms always improve banks efficiency and competition? A long-term analysis of Turkey’s experience," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 458-469, December.
    16. Souhir Elhmedi & Niazi Kammoun, 2024. "Capital account liberalization and economic growth in Tunisia," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(6), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Carretta, Alessandro & Cucinelli, Doriana & Fattobene, Lucrezia & Schwizer, Paola, 2025. "Bank misconduct: The deterrent effect of country governance and customer reaction," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Johannes Ehrentraud, 2022. "Comment on “Chinese Fintech Innovation and Regulation”," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 17(2), pages 295-296, July.
    19. Martynova, Natalya & Vogel, Ursula, 2022. "Banks’ complexity-risk nexus and the role of regulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Michael Sigmund & Kevin Zimmermann, 2021. "Determinants of Contingent Convertible Bond Coupon Rates of Banks: An Empirical Analysis (Michael Sigmund, Kevin Zimmermann)," Working Papers 236, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:53:y:2024:i:c:s1467089524000174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.