IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v97y2010i2-3p195-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of parental support for governmental alcohol control policies

Author

Listed:
  • Van Hoof, Joris J.
  • Gosselt, Jordy F.
  • de Jong, Menno D.T.

Abstract

Aim To explore determinants that predict parental support for governmental alcohol control policies in the Netherlands.Method A questionnaire was administered among 1550 parents, containing six possible predictors to explain support for alcohol control policies.Results Parental support can be explained by five partly normative predictors (R2Â =Â .503). Parents with lower drinking frequencies are stricter and more supportive than parents who consume more alcohol. Higher-educated parents are stricter than lower-educated parents.Conclusion In general, parents do support governmental alcohol control policies. Communication of the fact that youth alcohol consumption is problematic tends to increase parental support. Also, if policy makers are able to influence parents' opinions on the consequences of alcohol consumption, as well as the norm of not consuming alcohol before 16 years of age, then parental support increases. Parents' experiences with drunken youths also explain support. Factual knowledge does not influence support, so information campaigns alone do not increase parental support.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Hoof, Joris J. & Gosselt, Jordy F. & de Jong, Menno D.T., 2010. "Determinants of parental support for governmental alcohol control policies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(2-3), pages 195-201, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:97:y:2010:i:2-3:p:195-201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(10)00131-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dave Lamble & Sirpa Rajalin & Heikki Summala, 2002. "Mobile phone use while driving: public opinions on restrictions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 223-236, August.
    2. Exum, M. Lyn, 2006. "Alcohol and aggression: An integration of findings from experimental studies," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 131-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kee-Jiar Yeo & Shih-Hui Lee, 2022. "Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Parental Attitude and Health Beliefs Toward Sexuality Education," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    2. Kee-Jiar Yeo & Shih-Hui Lee, 2023. "Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Parental Attitude and Health Beliefs Toward Sexuality Education," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristin Feltmann & Johanna Gripenberg & Tobias H. Elgán, 2020. "Compliance to the Alcohol Law: Overserving to Obviously Intoxicated Visitors at Music Festivals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-6, November.
    2. Jennings, Wesley G. & Piquero, Alex R. & Rocque, Michael & Farrington, David P., 2015. "The effects of binge and problem drinking on problem behavior and adjustment over the life course: Findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 453-463.
    3. Laurent Bègue, 2011. "Conduites agressives et alcoolisation," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 448(1), pages 177-190.
    4. Ieuan Evans & Jon Heron & Joseph Murray & Matthew Hickman & Gemma Hammerton, 2021. "The Influence of Alcohol Consumption on Fighting, Shoplifting and Vandalism in Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Mathew P. White & J. Richard Eiser & Peter R. Harris, 2004. "Risk Perceptions of Mobile Phone Use While Driving," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 323-334, April.
    6. Chi‐Shun Liao & Kuo‐Ren Lou & Ching‐Tzu Gao, 2013. "Sustainable Development of Electrical and Electronic Equipment: User‐driven Green Design for Cell Phones," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 36-48, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:97:y:2010:i:2-3:p:195-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.