IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v125y2021i1p1-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The 2019 Health Basic Law in Portugal: Political arguments from the left and right

Author

Listed:
  • Simões, Jorge
  • Fronteira, Inês
  • Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo

Abstract

The Portuguese National Health Service (NHS) was established in 1979. Since its inception, the relationship of the NHS with private-for-profit and private-non-profit organisations has been controversially discussed between left and right-wing political parties, and this has also led also to academic debate. In 1990, a Health Basic Law was approved by right-wing parties, which allowed public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the health system and led to an increased role of the private sector in health care provision. During the 2015 general elections, the role of PPPs in the health system was an important topic of discussion, with all left-wing parties calling for an end of PPPs in the NHS. In 2019, after two years of intense political controversies, left-wing parties supporting the minority socialist government approved a new Health Basic Law. This paper analyses the process of policy formulation, tracing the process of adoption and the views of the main political parties involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Simões, Jorge & Fronteira, Inês & Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo, 2021. "The 2019 Health Basic Law in Portugal: Political arguments from the left and right," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 1-6.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:125:y:2021:i:1:p:1-6
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851020302773
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saltman, Richard B., 1997. "The context for health reform in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(Supplemen), pages 9-26, September.
    2. Comendeiro-Maaløe, Micaela & Ridao-López, Manuel & Gorgemans, Sophie & Bernal-Delgado, Enrique, 2019. "Public-private partnerships in the Spanish National Health System: The reversion of the Alzira model," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(4), pages 408-411.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamdan, Motasem & Defever, Mia, 2002. "A `transitional' context for health policy development: the Palestinian case," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 193-207, March.
    2. Hafiz Syed Mohsin Abbas & Xiaodong Xu & Chunxia Sun & Samreen Gillani & Muhammad Ahsan Ali Raza, 2023. "Role of Chinese government and Public–Private Partnership in combating COVID-19 in China," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 727-748, September.
    3. Shin, Young-Jeon, 2006. "Policy context of the poor progress of the pro-poor policy: A case study on the Medical-Aid policy during Kim Dae-jung's Government (1998-2002) in the Republic of Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(2-3), pages 209-223, October.
    4. Miguel A. Pereira & Diogo C. Ferreira & Rui C. Marques, 2021. "A critical look at the Portuguese public–private partnerships in healthcare," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 302-315, March.
    5. Delnoij, Diana & Brenner, Gerhard, 2000. "Importing budget systems from other countries: what can we learn from the German drug budget and the British GP fundholding?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 157-169, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:125:y:2021:i:1:p:1-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.