IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v30y2013icp1-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interest rates in the German forest valuation literature of the early nineteenth century

Author

Listed:
  • Moog, Martin
  • Bösch, Matthias

Abstract

Valuation with the help of the present value method can be traced back to at least medieval times. In forest literature the scientific achievement of calculating the present value of forestland is predominantly attributed to Martin Faustmann, whose 1849 publication is truly considered pioneering. However, without cheapening Faustmann's intellectual effort, this paper points to some earlier and relatively unknown German authors. By doing so, it presents the state of knowledge on forest valuation in the early nineteenth century, which is a very interesting and lively period of time with respect to the choice of the interest rate. It is revealed that already at that time publications on forest valuation showed a tendency towards an interest rate that yields a desired result.

Suggested Citation

  • Moog, Martin & Bösch, Matthias, 2013. "Interest rates in the German forest valuation literature of the early nineteenth century," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-5.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:30:y:2013:i:c:p:1-5
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.03.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934113000506
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.03.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viitala, Esa-Jussi, 2006. "An early contribution of Martin Faustmann to natural resource economics," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 131-144, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. P. Hlaváčková & D. Šafařík, 2016. "Quantification of the utility value of the recreational function of forests from the aspect of valuation practice," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(8), pages 345-356.
    2. Viitala, Esa-Jussi, 2016. "Faustmann formula before Faustmann in German territorial states," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 47-58.
    3. Deegen, Peter, 2016. "Private and public timber production: How markets and political institutions matter," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 56-65.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viitala, Esa-Jussi, 2016. "Faustmann formula before Faustmann in German territorial states," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 47-58.
    2. Rytteri, Teijo & Peltola, Taru & Leskinen, Leena A., 2016. "Co-production of forestry science and society: Evolving interpretations of economic sustainability in Finnish forestry textbooks," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 21-36.
    3. An, Hyunjin, 2017. "Forest Carbon Sequestration And Optimal Harvesting Decision Considering Southern Pine Beetle (Spb) Disturbance: A Real Option Approach," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 40(Special, ), December.
    4. Tee, James & Scarpa, Riccardo & Marsh, Dan & Guthrie, Graeme, 2010. "A Binomial Tree Approach to Valuing Fixed Rotation Forests and Flexible Rotation Forests Under a Mean Reverting Timber Price Process," 2010 Conference, August 26-27, 2010, Nelson, New Zealand 96836, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:30:y:2013:i:c:p:1-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.