IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v79y2025ics154461232500529x.html

Does the abrupt change of a partner or manager affect audit quality?

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Huanmin
  • Yu, Zile
  • Zhao, Haodong
  • Jiang, Hangyu
  • Zhang, Xuehua

Abstract

Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies, this study examines how the abrupt change of a partner or manager impacts audit quality. Findings suggest that the abrupt change of a partner or manager significantly reduces audit quality. The negative impact on audit quality is the most significant when both partner and manager changed rather than when either the partner or manager changed. Further analysis shows that disclosing a change or reappointing a former auditor can mitigate the negative impact of this abrupt change on audit quality. The negative effects of abrupt auditor change on audit quality are more pronounced in smaller accounting firms and non-state-owned enterprises compared with larger accounting firms and state-owned enterprises. These findings can help improve the auditor appointment mechanism within accounting firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Huanmin & Yu, Zile & Zhao, Haodong & Jiang, Hangyu & Zhang, Xuehua, 2025. "Does the abrupt change of a partner or manager affect audit quality?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:79:y:2025:i:c:s154461232500529x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.107266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154461232500529X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Lihong & Xiao, Tingting & Zhou, Jia, 2023. "Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Wen-Ching Chang & Yahn-Shir Chen, 2017. "Shopping for Accounting Accruals and Restatements," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 554-562, March.
    3. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    4. Hou, Fei & Li, Meina & Xu, Yang & Zhou, Song, 2023. "Signing auditors’ cultural background and client investment efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Larry R. Davis & Billy S. Soo & Gregory M. Trompeter, 2009. "Auditor Tenure and the Ability to Meet or Beat Earnings Forecasts," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 517-548, June.
    6. Jiang, Honglan & Jiang, Qing, 2024. "How regulatory media information disclosure affects auditor selection–Empirical evidence based on the interaction platform between investors and listed companies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Paolo Perego & Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla, 2026. "Assurance Provider Rotation and Sustainability Assurance Quality," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(1), pages 917-950, March.
    2. Shivaram Rajgopal & Suraj Srinivasan & Xin Zheng, 2021. "Measuring audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 559-619, June.
    3. Bandyopadhyay, Sati P. & Chen, Changling & Yu, Yingmin, 2014. "Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit market concentration, and audit quality: Evidence from China," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 18-31.
    4. Timothy B. Bell & Monika Causholli & W. Robert Knechel, 2015. "Audit Firm Tenure, Non‐Audit Services, and Internal Assessments of Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 53(3), pages 461-509, June.
    5. Knechel, W. Robert & Thomas, Edward & Driskill, Matthew, 2020. "Understanding financial auditing from a service perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Dilek Kaçmaz & Ahmet Türel, 2021. "Audit Quality and Rotation: Perception in Turkey," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(91), pages 109-122, December.
    7. Jeong-Bon Kim & Byron Song & Judy Tsui, 2013. "Auditor size, tenure, and bank loan pricing," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 75-99, January.
    8. Ball, Fiona & Tyler, Jonathan & Wells, Peter, 2015. "Is audit quality impacted by auditor relationships?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 166-181.
    9. Patrick Velte & Carl-Christian Freidank, 2015. "The link between in- and external rotation of the auditor and the quality of financial accounting and external audit," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 225-246, October.
    10. Patrick Velte, 2012. "External rotation of the auditor," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 81-91, September.
    11. Firth, Michael & Rui, Oliver M. & Wu, Xi, 2012. "How Do Various Forms of Auditor Rotation Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from China," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 109-138.
    12. Brian Bratten & Monika Causholli & Thomas C. Omer, 2019. "Audit Firm Tenure, Bank Complexity, and Financial Reporting Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 295-325, March.
    13. Eun Jung Cho & Ju Ryum Chung & Ho-Young Lee, 2019. "The Role of Labor Unions in Corporate Transparency: Focusing on the Role of Governance in Auditor Change Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Garcia-Blandon, Josep & Argiles, Josep Ma, 2015. "Audit firm tenure and independence: A comprehensive investigation of audit qualifications in Spain," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 82-93.
    15. Chen, Lihong & Xiao, Tingting & Zhou, Jia, 2023. "Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Lisic, Ling Lei & Silveri, Sabatino (Dino) & Song, Yanheng & Wang, Kun, 2015. "Accounting fraud, auditing, and the role of government sanctions in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1186-1195.
    17. Chen, Jean Jinghan & Huang, Lingyu & Xiao, Jason Zezhong & Zhang, Haoyu, 2025. "Do auditors charge clients with higher audit fees for blockchain investments?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    18. Konstantinos Vasilakopoulos & Christos Tzovas & Apostolos Ballas, 2021. "Banks’ Risk and The Impact of Audit Quality on Income Smoothing," Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 425-453, September.
    19. Neal Arthur & Medhat Endrawes & Shawn Ho, 2017. "Impact of Partner Change on Audit Quality: An Analysis of Partner and Firm Specialisation Effects," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 368-381, December.
    20. Chi Duong Thi, 2023. "Audit Quality, Institutional Environments, and Earnings Management: An Empirical Analysis of New Listings," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:79:y:2025:i:c:s154461232500529x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.