IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v98y2023ics0149718923000460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of evaluator professional autonomy in North American evaluation practice

Author

Listed:
  • Ayoo, Sandra

Abstract

Scholarship from the sociology of professions has illustrated the important role that autonomy must play in professional relationships, especially in technically-specific and relationally-strong fields of practice like program evaluation. Theoretically, autonomy is important because the evaluation professional ought to be free to make recommendations in several key areas: framing the evaluation questions, including questions of unintended consequences; developing evaluation plans; choosing methods; analyzing data; making conclusions, including negative findings in reports; and, increasingly, ensuring that historically underrepresented stakeholders without voice are represented and involved in the evaluation process. This study found that evaluators in Canada and the USA reportedly did not perceive autonomy as related to the larger role of the field of evaluation, but rather as a contextual personal concern, that is, related to matters of personal circumstance, such as their workplace, years of experience, financial security, and the backing or lack thereof from professional associations. The article concludes with implications for practice and future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayoo, Sandra, 2023. "Perceptions of evaluator professional autonomy in North American evaluation practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:98:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923000460
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718923000460
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Jean A. & Ayoo, Sandra, 2020. "What do we know about evaluator education? A review of peer-reviewed publications (1978–2018)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Morell, Jonathan A. & Flaherty, Eugenie Walsh, 1978. "The development of evaluation as a profession: Current status and some predictions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 11-17, January.
    3. Donaldson, Scott I., 2019. "Where do we stand? Recent AEA member views on professionalization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 152-161.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gullickson, Amy M. & King, Jean A. & LaVelle, John M. & Clinton, Janet M., 2019. "The current state of evaluator education: A situation analysis and call to action," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 20-30.
    2. King, Jean A. & Clinton, Janet, 2022. "Introduction to the special issue on evaluator education," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Connors, Susan C. & Komaie, Goldie & Proctor, Jeff, 2023. "Exploring the value of pro bono evaluation work as a method to build evaluator competencies and strengthen organizational capacity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. John G. Heilman, 1983. "Beyond the Technical and Bureaucratic Theories of Utilization," Evaluation Review, , vol. 7(6), pages 707-728, December.
    5. Gullickson, Amy M., 2020. "The whole elephant: Defining evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Sowl, Stephanie & Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey & Collins, Clarin, 2022. "Teaching program evaluation: How blending theory and practice enhance student-evaluator competencies in an education policy graduate program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:98:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923000460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.