IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v111y2025ics0149718925000801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professionalism in evaluation: Development and validation of a theory-based assessment tool in the U.S. context

Author

Listed:
  • Ayoo, Sandra Nyashaddai

Abstract

While professionalization of program evaluation is garnering increasing attention in the literature, a notable gap exists in the absence of a validated, theory-based framework to both comprehend and empirically assess the attributes of a professional evaluator. This study contributes to the debate on the professionalism of evaluators in two ways: by elaborating a multidimensional, theory-based conceptualization of evaluator professionalism, and by developing and testing a professionalism self-assessment tool for novice and practicing evaluators to assess their levels of professionalism. The five dimensions of the tool developed using the sociological model were: expertise, innovation and research, professional autonomy, ethical dispositions, and credentialing. The model was validated using data from online survey administered to a random sample of 2000 members of the American Evaluation Association drawn from the 2018 membership directory. This study provides evidence that the professionalism assessment tool used with both novice and experienced evaluators produced reliable scores and demonstrated validity in measuring key attributes of evaluator professionalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayoo, Sandra Nyashaddai, 2025. "Professionalism in evaluation: Development and validation of a theory-based assessment tool in the U.S. context," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000801
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000801
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.