A pilot evaluation of the Family Caregiver Support Program
The purposes of this study were to evaluate a federal and state-funded Family Caregiver Support Program (FCSP) and explore what types of caregiver support service are associated with what caregiver outcomes. Information was obtained on a sample of 164 caregivers' use of eleven different types of support service. Descriptive and comparative analyses were used to detect the differences between users and nonusers of caregiver support services. Six measures included were caregiving appraisal scale, caregiving burden, caregiving mastery, caregiving satisfaction, hour of care, and service satisfaction. Using consulting and education services is associated with lessening of subjective burden; using financial support services is associated with more beneficial caregiver appraisal, such as better caregiver mastery. The findings are practical and helpful for future caregiver service and program development and evaluation and policy making for supporting caregivers. In addition, the evaluation method demonstrated in the study provided a simple and moderately effective method for service agencies which would like to evaluate their family caregiver support services.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Toseland, Ronald W. & McCallion, Philip & Gerber, Todd & Banks, Steve, 2002. "Predictors of health and human services use by persons with dementia and their family caregivers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 1255-1266, October.
- Toseland, Ronald W. & Blanchard, Christina G. & McCallion, Philip, 1995. "A problem solving intervention for caregivers of cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 517-528, February.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:2:p:113-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.