IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v33y2010i1p45-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining practice: Flexibility, legitimacy, and the nature of systems of care and wraparound

Author

Listed:
  • Bruns, Eric J.
  • Walker, Janet S.

Abstract

In human services, clear definition of key concepts and strategies is critical to facilitating training, implementation, and research. This article reflects on methods undertaken to specify the wraparound process for children and families, and considers lessons that may be relevant to defining the system of care concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruns, Eric J. & Walker, Janet S., 2010. "Defining practice: Flexibility, legitimacy, and the nature of systems of care and wraparound," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 45-48, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:1:p:45-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(09)00030-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foster, E. Michael & Stephens, Robert & Krivelyova, Anna & Gamfi, Phyllis, 2007. "Can system integration improve mental health outcomes for children and youth?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1301-1319, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gifford, Elizabeth J. & Wells, Rebecca S. & Bai, Yu & Malone, Patrick S., 2015. "Is implementation fidelity associated with improved access to care in a School-based Child and Family Team model?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 41-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:1:p:45-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.