IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v111y2025ics0149718925000722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed-methods evaluation of the Caregiving Essentials Course for unpaid caregivers of older adults in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Rottenberg, Shelley
  • Williams, Allison
  • Chmiel, Brooke

Abstract

Unpaid caregiving is a growing phenomenon, but many family members and friends fall into the role without any prior experience or training. Therefore, many individuals are unequipped with the necessary knowledge and skills needed to manage the demands of caregiving. The Caregiving Essentials course was created to meet the growing need for information and resources among unpaid caregivers of older adults in Ontario (Canada). The evaluation assessed whether the online knowledge intervention was effective in improving the following four areas from the experiences of the caregiver participants: 1) Knowledge, confidence, skills, abilities and self-efficacy; 2) Self-reported sense of personal health and well-being; 3) Perceptions of health and well-being of the care recipient; and 4) Understanding and access to the health and social service system. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach, a total of 39 post-course survey responses were collected concurrently with 26 semi-structured interviews with participants who completed half or more (two or more modules). Survey responses were analyzed for descriptive statistics. Thematic coding of interview data was completed using NVivo software and triangulated with the descriptive statistics. Survey findings reveal that the course was not necessarily effective in improving caregivers’ health and well-being because of external factors, but 91 percent of post-survey respondents reported being able to use the course content in their role as a caregiver. Thematic analysis of the interview data indicates participates recognize the course as being effective in improving participants’ self-perceived knowledge, confidence, and access to resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Rottenberg, Shelley & Williams, Allison & Chmiel, Brooke, 2025. "A mixed-methods evaluation of the Caregiving Essentials Course for unpaid caregivers of older adults in Canada," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000722
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000722
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.