IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v186y2019ics0360544219315130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal operation of a multi-energy system considering renewable energy sources stochasticity and impacts of electric vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Ata, Mustafa
  • Erenoğlu, Ayşe Kübra
  • Şengör, İbrahim
  • Erdinç, Ozan
  • Taşcıkaraoğlu, Akın
  • Catalão, João P.S.

Abstract

Electrical, heating and cooling energy demands of the end users are increasing day by day. For the sake of using fewer fossil fuels, decreasing the energy costs and gas emissions as well as increasing the efficiency and flexibility of the traditional energy systems, multi-energy systems (MESs) have begun to be used. In this study, a MES structure which also includes renewable-based generation units as suppliers together with combined heating and power (CHP) and heat pumps (HPs) is presented. The proposed MES structure is modelled as a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) problem with the objective of minimizing total gas and electricity costs in daily operation. Furthermore, electric vehicles (EVs) as a new type of electrical load with inherently different characteristics are evaluated considering different end-user types as residential and commercial together with the capability of offering operational flexibility. In order to tackle with the intermittent structure of the renewable energy sources, a scenario oriented stochastic programming concept is taken into account by addressing real radiation, temperature, and wind data. Moreover, actual time-of-use (TOU) tariffs for electricity prices along with the real gas prices are evaluated. The simulation results of the devised model are given for different case studies and the effectiveness of the system is demonstrated via a comparative study. As a result, it is found that the operational costs are decreased nearly 5.49% by integrating only photovoltaic (PV) production according to the case which has no additional sources. Also, a substantial reduction of 13.45% is achieved by considering both PV and wind generation. Moreover, the flexibility is increased with taking EVs into account on the demand side and this leads to a cost reduction of 8.81% even if EVs are integrated to the system as an extra load.

Suggested Citation

  • Ata, Mustafa & Erenoğlu, Ayşe Kübra & Şengör, İbrahim & Erdinç, Ozan & Taşcıkaraoğlu, Akın & Catalão, João P.S., 2019. "Optimal operation of a multi-energy system considering renewable energy sources stochasticity and impacts of electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:186:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219315130
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219315130
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mittelviefhaus, Moritz & Pareschi, Giacomo & Allan, James & Georges, Gil & Boulouchos, Konstantinos, 2021. "Optimal investment and scheduling of residential multi-energy systems including electric mobility: A cost-effective approach to climate change mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    2. Naghikhani, Ali & Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad Hassan, 2022. "Optimal thermal and power planning considering economic and environmental issues in peak load management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    3. Zhou, Yuekuan, 2023. "Sustainable energy sharing districts with electrochemical battery degradation in design, planning, operation and multi-objective optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1324-1341.
    4. Qingyou Yan & Meijuan Zhang & Wei Li & Guangyu Qin, 2020. "Risk Assessment of New Energy Vehicle Supply Chain Based on Variable Weight Theory and Cloud Model: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Vahid-Ghavidel, Morteza & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Javadi, Mohammad S. & Santos, Sérgio F. & Gough, Matthew & Quijano, Darwin A. & Catalao, Joao P.S., 2023. "Hybrid IGDT-stochastic self-scheduling of a distributed energy resources aggregator in a multi-energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    6. Çiçek, Alper & Şengör, İbrahim & Erenoğlu, Ayşe Kübra & Erdinç, Ozan, 2020. "Decision making mechanism for a smart neighborhood fed by multi-energy systems considering demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    7. Alabi, Tobi Michael & Aghimien, Emmanuel I. & Agbajor, Favour D. & Yang, Zaiyue & Lu, Lin & Adeoye, Adebusola R. & Gopaluni, Bhushan, 2022. "A review on the integrated optimization techniques and machine learning approaches for modeling, prediction, and decision making on integrated energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 822-849.
    8. Petkov, Ivalin & Gabrielli, Paolo & Spokaite, Marija, 2021. "The impact of urban district composition on storage technology reliance: trade-offs between thermal storage, batteries, and power-to-hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Zhang, Bin & Hu, Weihao & Cao, Di & Ghias, Amer M.Y.M. & Chen, Zhe, 2023. "Novel Data-Driven decentralized coordination model for electric vehicle aggregator and energy hub entities in multi-energy system using an improved multi-agent DRL approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    10. Noorollahi, Younes & Golshanfard, Aminabbas & Hashemi-Dezaki, Hamed, 2022. "A scenario-based approach for optimal operation of energy hub under different schemes and structures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:186:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219315130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.