IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v193y2024ics0301421524002921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local versus outsider developers: Impact on development duration and its’ implications for community acceptance of solar PV plants in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Ki, Jaehong
  • Yun, Sun-Jin

Abstract

This study focused on community acceptance of small to medium solar PV plant projects in South Korea, which has rarely been the subject of research despite reports of disputes. It set out to determine whether there is a difference in community acceptance based on a project being developed by local residents or by outsiders. We used the duration of development for each plant as a proxy variable for the level of acceptance. We interpreted longer development duration as corresponding to a lower level of community acceptance when other characteristics of solar PV plants were controlled for. Analyses using a censored regression model indicated that the development duration was shorter (with statistical significance) when plants were developed by local residents rather than by outsiders. Further investigation revealed local resident involvement had more effect on reducing the development duration for plants exploiting forested land, the type for which community acceptance was known to be low. The effect was not evident when the plants were developed using existing buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ki, Jaehong & Yun, Sun-Jin, 2024. "Local versus outsider developers: Impact on development duration and its’ implications for community acceptance of solar PV plants in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:193:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002921
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524002921
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:193:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.