IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v29y2007i5p1050-1100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

U.S. nuclear plant decommissioning funding adequacy -- by individual funds, utilities, reactors, and industry-wide -- assessed by Monte Carlo and baseline trend methods: 1998, 2000, 2001, and 2004

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Daniel G.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Daniel G., 2007. "U.S. nuclear plant decommissioning funding adequacy -- by individual funds, utilities, reactors, and industry-wide -- assessed by Monte Carlo and baseline trend methods: 1998, 2000, 2001, and 2004," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1050-1100, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:29:y:2007:i:5:p:1050-1100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140-9883(06)00037-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Daniel G., 2007. "Scenario simulations do not yield results stochastically consistent with alternative Monte Carlo results: U.S. nuclear plant decommissioning funding adequacy (2000)," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1101-1130, September.
    2. Thomas LaGuardia, 1991. "Chapter 12 - A Private Contractor's Approach to Decommissioning Costs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 157-172.
    3. Robert Wood, 1991. "Chapter 4 - Federal Regulation of Decommissioning Economics," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 45-54.
    4. Thomas R. Tuschen, 1991. "Chapter 17 - Investment Strategies for Externalized Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 217-230.
    5. Satoshi Yanagihara & Mitsugu Tanaka, 1991. "Chapter 10 - Estimating the Costs for Japan's JPDR Project," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 135-148.
    6. M. Didi Weinblatt & Salvatore D'Elia & Theresa A. Havell, 1991. "Chapter 16 - Historical Lessons for Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund Investment," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 205-216.
    7. Gordon MacKerron, 1991. "Chapter 2 - Decommissioning Costs and British Nuclear Policy," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 13-28.
    8. Surrey, John, 1992. "Ethics of nuclear decommissioning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(7), pages 632-640, July.
    9. Scott M. DuBoff & Daniel F. Stenger, 1991. "Chapter 6 - Divided Authority: Federal Vs. State Policy Roles in Decommissioning Economics," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 73-84.
    10. Nihal D. Jayawardene & Peter D. Stevens-Guille, 1991. "Chapter 14 - Strategy, Planning and Costing for Decommissioning in Canada," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 181-190.
    11. Ulrich Losch horn & Herbert Hollmann, 1991. "Chapter 13 - Decommissioning Plans and Costing in Germany," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 173-180.
    12. Surrey, John, 1994. "UK policy for nuclear decommissioning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(9), pages 723-724, September.
    13. Kenneth P. Ballard & Margot E. Carl Everett & Willard C. Everett, 1991. "Chapter 3 - Utilities and Decommissioning Costs: The Meeting of Technology and Society," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 29-42.
    14. Martin J. Pasqualetti, 1991. "Chapter 1 - The Place of Economics in Decommissioning Policy," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    15. James G. Hewlett, 1991. "Chapter 22 - Financial Implications of Early Decommissioning," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 279-292.
    16. Howard Hiller, 1991. "Chapter 15 - Managing Qualified Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds Under Uncertainty," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 191-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Williams, Daniel G., 2007. "Scenario simulations do not yield results stochastically consistent with alternative Monte Carlo results: U.S. nuclear plant decommissioning funding adequacy (2000)," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1101-1130, September.
    2. Scherwath, Tim & Wealer, Ben & Mendelevitch, Roman, 2020. "Nuclear decommissioning after the German Nuclear Phase-Out an integrated view on new regulations and nuclear logistics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Bärenbold, Rebekka & Weigt, Hannes & Rosner, Robert, 2023. "An ex-ante method to verify commercial U.S. nuclear power plant decommissioning cost estimates," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    4. Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Bärenbold, Rebekka & Weigt, Hannes & Rosner, Robert, 2022. "An Ex-Ante Method to Verify Commercial U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," Working papers 2022/08, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Bärenbold, Rebekka & Weigt, Hannes & Rosner, Robert, 2022. "An Ex-Ante Method to Verify Commercial U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," Working papers 2022/08, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    2. Montes, German Martinez & Martin, Enrique Prados & Bayo, Javier Alegre & Garcia, Javier Ordoñez, 2011. "The applicability of computer simulation using Monte Carlo techniques in windfarm profitability analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4746-4755.
    3. Aquila, Giancarlo & Rotela Junior, Paulo & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo, 2017. "Wind power feasibility analysis under uncertainty in the Brazilian electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 127-136.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:29:y:2007:i:5:p:1050-1100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.