IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v273y2019i1p74-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A further study on two-agent parallel-batch scheduling with release dates and deteriorating jobs to minimize the makespan

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Yuan
  • Yuan, Jinjiang
  • Ng, C.T.
  • Cheng, T.C.E.

Abstract

We re-visit the two-agent scheduling on a parallel-batch machine to minimize makespan, where jobs have release dates and linear deteriorating processing times. The objective is to minimize the makespan of agent A with the makespan of agent B being bounded. In the paper Tang, Zhao, Liu, and Leung (2017), the authors reported comprehensive research for this scheduling model. Especially, they presented polynomial-time algorithms for the following four problems. In the first, the batch capacity is unbounded and the two agents are compatible. In the second, the batch capacity is bounded, the two agents are incompatible, the A-jobs have a fixed number of normal processing times, and the B-jobs have a common release date. In the third and forth, the batch capacity is bounded, the two agents are compatible, and the release dates and normal processing times are either agreeable or reversely agreeable. But their discussions for the above four problems are logically confusing. In this paper we present a more efficient polynomial-time algorithm for the first problem and show that the other three problems are NP-hard. We also present a pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm for the version where the batch capacity is bounded, the two agents are incompatible, and A-jobs and B-jobs have their common release dates, respectively. We finally present a strongly polynomial-time algorithm for the version where the batch capacity is unbounded and the two agents are incompatible.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Yuan & Yuan, Jinjiang & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2019. "A further study on two-agent parallel-batch scheduling with release dates and deteriorating jobs to minimize the makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 74-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:273:y:2019:i:1:p:74-81
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221718306623
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan, B.Q. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Two-agent scheduling in a flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 376-384.
    2. Ng, C.T. & Barketau, M.S. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2010. ""Product Partition" and related problems of scheduling and systems reliability: Computational complexity and approximation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 601-604, December.
    3. Joseph Y.-T. Leung & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2010. "Competitive Two-Agent Scheduling and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 458-469, April.
    4. Allesandro Agnetis & Pitu B. Mirchandani & Dario Pacciarelli & Andrea Pacifici, 2004. "Scheduling Problems with Two Competing Agents," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 229-242, April.
    5. Wang, Jun-Qiang & Fan, Guo-Qiang & Zhang, Yingqian & Zhang, Cheng-Wu & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2017. "Two-agent scheduling on a single parallel-batching machine with equal processing time and non-identical job sizes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 478-490.
    6. Chung-Yee Lee & Reha Uzsoy & Louis A. Martin-Vega, 1992. "Efficient Algorithms for Scheduling Semiconductor Burn-In Operations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 764-775, August.
    7. Li, Shisheng & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2011. "Parallel-batch scheduling of deteriorating jobs with release dates to minimize the makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 482-488, May.
    8. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2014. "A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-16.
    9. Tang, Lixin & Zhao, Xiaoli & Liu, Jiyin & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2017. "Competitive two-agent scheduling with deteriorating jobs on a single parallel-batching machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 401-411.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Xingong, 2021. "Two competitive agents to minimize the weighted total late work and the total completion time," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
    2. Fowler, John W. & Mönch, Lars, 2022. "A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 1-24.
    3. Wan, Long & Mei, Jiajie & Du, Jiangze, 2021. "Two-agent scheduling of unit processing time jobs to minimize total weighted completion time and total weighted number of tardy jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 26-35.
    4. Ozturk, Onur, 2020. "A truncated column generation algorithm for the parallel batch scheduling problem to minimize total flow time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 432-443.
    5. Chen, Rubing & Geng, Zhichao & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang & Zhang, Yuan, 2022. "Pareto-scheduling of two competing agents with their own equal processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 414-431.
    6. Zhi Pei & Mingzhong Wan & Ziteng Wang, 2020. "A new approximation algorithm for unrelated parallel machine scheduling with release dates," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 397-425, February.
    7. Shaojun Lu & Min Kong & Zhiping Zhou & Xinbao Liu & Siwen Liu, 2022. "A hybrid metaheuristic for a semiconductor production scheduling problem with deterioration effect and resource constraints," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5405-5440, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Rubing & Geng, Zhichao & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang & Zhang, Yuan, 2022. "Pareto-scheduling of two competing agents with their own equal processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 414-431.
    2. Tang, Lixin & Zhao, Xiaoli & Liu, Jiyin & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2017. "Competitive two-agent scheduling with deteriorating jobs on a single parallel-batching machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 401-411.
    3. Stanisław Gawiejnowicz, 2020. "A review of four decades of time-dependent scheduling: main results, new topics, and open problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 3-47, February.
    4. Jun Pei & Jinling Wei & Baoyu Liao & Xinbao Liu & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Two-agent scheduling on bounded parallel-batching machines with an aging effect of job-position-dependent," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 191-223, November.
    5. Dujuan Wang & Yugang Yu & Huaxin Qiu & Yunqiang Yin & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "Two‐agent scheduling with linear resource‐dependent processing times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(7), pages 573-591, October.
    6. Zhang Xingong & Wang Yong, 2017. "Two-agent scheduling problems on a single-machine to minimize the total weighted late work," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 945-955, April.
    7. Wan, Long & Mei, Jiajie & Du, Jiangze, 2021. "Two-agent scheduling of unit processing time jobs to minimize total weighted completion time and total weighted number of tardy jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 26-35.
    8. Byung-Gyoo Kim & Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2017. "Two-Machine and Two-Agent Flow Shop with Special Processing Times Structures," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(04), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Yunqiang Yin & T. C. E. Cheng & Du-Juan Wang & Chin-Chia Wu, 2017. "Two-agent flowshop scheduling to maximize the weighted number of just-in-time jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 313-335, August.
    10. Zhang, Xingong, 2021. "Two competitive agents to minimize the weighted total late work and the total completion time," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
    11. Wang, Jun-Qiang & Fan, Guo-Qiang & Zhang, Yingqian & Zhang, Cheng-Wu & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2017. "Two-agent scheduling on a single parallel-batching machine with equal processing time and non-identical job sizes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 478-490.
    12. Fowler, John W. & Mönch, Lars, 2022. "A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 1-24.
    13. Vahid Nasrollahi & Ghasem Moslehi & Mohammad Reisi-Nafchi, 2022. "Minimizing the weighted sum of maximum earliness and maximum tardiness in a single-agent and two-agent form of a two-machine flow shop scheduling problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1403-1442, April.
    14. Geng, Zhichao & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2023. "Single-machine scheduling of multiple projects with controllable processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1074-1090.
    15. Ruyan He & Jinjiang Yuan, 2020. "Two-Agent Preemptive Pareto-Scheduling to Minimize Late Work and Other Criteria," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Zhichao Geng & Jiayu Liu, 0. "Single machine batch scheduling with two non-disjoint agents and splitable jobs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    17. Ren-Xia Chen & Shi-Sheng Li, 2019. "Two-agent single-machine scheduling with cumulative deterioration," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 201-219, June.
    18. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    19. Zhichao Geng & Jiayu Liu, 2020. "Single machine batch scheduling with two non-disjoint agents and splitable jobs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 774-795, October.
    20. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng, 2016. "Scheduling two job families on a single machine with two competitive agents," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 784-799, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:273:y:2019:i:1:p:74-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.