IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v181y2007i1p195-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On operators and search space topology in multi-objective flow shop scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Geiger, Martin Josef

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Geiger, Martin Josef, 2007. "On operators and search space topology in multi-objective flow shop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 195-206, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:181:y:2007:i:1:p:195-206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(06)00421-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C.R. Reeves, 1999. "Landscapes, operators and heuristic search," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 86(0), pages 473-490, January.
    2. Demirkol, Ebru & Mehta, Sanjay & Uzsoy, Reha, 1998. "Benchmarks for shop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 137-141, August.
    3. Taillard, E., 1993. "Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 278-285, January.
    4. Mattfeld, Dirk C. & Bierwirth, Christian, 2004. "An efficient genetic algorithm for job shop scheduling with tardiness objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 616-630, June.
    5. Loukil, T. & Teghem, J. & Tuyttens, D., 2005. "Solving multi-objective production scheduling problems using metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 42-61, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ciavotta, Michele & Minella, Gerardo & Ruiz, Rubén, 2013. "Multi-objective sequence dependent setup times permutation flowshop: A new algorithm and a comprehensive study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 301-313.
    2. Yenisey, Mehmet Mutlu & Yagmahan, Betul, 2014. "Multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem: Literature review, classification and current trends," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-135.
    3. Lang, Fabian & Fink, Andreas & Brandt, Tobias, 2016. "Design of automated negotiation mechanisms for decentralized heterogeneous machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 192-203.
    4. Gerardo Minella & Rubén Ruiz & Michele Ciavotta, 2008. "A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Algorithms for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 451-471, August.
    5. Gülcin Ermis & Can Akkan, 2019. "Search algorithms for improving the pareto front in a timetabling problem with a solution network-based robustness measure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(1), pages 101-121, April.
    6. Jianhui Mou & Xinyu Li & Liang Gao & Wenchao Yi, 2018. "An effective L-MONG algorithm for solving multi-objective flow-shop inverse scheduling problems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 789-807, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yenisey, Mehmet Mutlu & Yagmahan, Betul, 2014. "Multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem: Literature review, classification and current trends," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-135.
    2. Gerardo Minella & Rubén Ruiz & Michele Ciavotta, 2008. "A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Algorithms for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 451-471, August.
    3. Bierwirth, C. & Kuhpfahl, J., 2017. "Extended GRASP for the job shop scheduling problem with total weighted tardiness objective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 835-848.
    4. Edzard Weber & Anselm Tiefenbacher & Norbert Gronau, 2019. "Need for Standardization and Systematization of Test Data for Job-Shop Scheduling," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Talens, Carla & Prata, Bruno de Athayde, 2025. "A speed-up procedure and new heuristics for the classical job shop scheduling problem: A computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(3), pages 783-794.
    6. Chiang, Tsung-Che & Fu, Li-Chen, 2009. "Using a family of critical ratio-based approaches to minimize the number of tardy jobs in the job shop with sequence dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 78-92, July.
    7. Liu, Jiyin & Reeves, Colin R, 2001. "Constructive and composite heuristic solutions to the P//[summation operator]Ci scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 439-452, July.
    8. Andrzej Bożek, 2020. "Energy Cost-Efficient Task Positioning in Manufacturing Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    9. J M Framinan & J N D Gupta & R Leisten, 2004. "A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1243-1255, December.
    10. Bahman Naderi & Rubén Ruiz & Vahid Roshanaei, 2023. "Mixed-Integer Programming vs. Constraint Programming for Shop Scheduling Problems: New Results and Outlook," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 817-843, July.
    11. Jelke J. Hoorn, 2018. "The Current state of bounds on benchmark instances of the job-shop scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 127-128, February.
    12. Jianhui Mou & Xinyu Li & Liang Gao & Wenchao Yi, 2018. "An effective L-MONG algorithm for solving multi-objective flow-shop inverse scheduling problems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 789-807, April.
    13. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.
    14. Nowicki, Eugeniusz & Smutnicki, Czeslaw, 2006. "Some aspects of scatter search in the flow-shop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 654-666, March.
    15. Ciavotta, Michele & Minella, Gerardo & Ruiz, Rubén, 2013. "Multi-objective sequence dependent setup times permutation flowshop: A new algorithm and a comprehensive study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 301-313.
    16. Yannik Zeiträg & José Rui Figueira, 2023. "Automatically evolving preference-based dispatching rules for multi-objective job shop scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 289-314, June.
    17. Da Col, Giacomo & Teppan, Erich C., 2022. "Industrial-size job shop scheduling with constraint programming," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    18. E. Dhouib & J. Teghem & T. Loukil, 2018. "Non-permutation flowshop scheduling problem with minimal and maximal time lags: theoretical study and heuristic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 101-134, August.
    19. Tsogbetse, Israël & Bernard, Julien & Manier, Hervé & Manier, Marie-Ange, 2024. "Influence of encoding and neighborhood in landscape analysis and tabu search performance for job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 739-746.
    20. Vallada, Eva & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2015. "New hard benchmark for flowshop scheduling problems minimising makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 666-677.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:181:y:2007:i:1:p:195-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.