IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v113y1999i2p300-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The `Light Beam Search' approach - an overview of methodology and applications

Author

Listed:
  • Jaszkiewicz, Andrzej
  • Slowinski, Roman

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaszkiewicz, Andrzej & Slowinski, Roman, 1999. "The `Light Beam Search' approach - an overview of methodology and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 300-314, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:113:y:1999:i:2:p:300-314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(98)00218-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buchanan, J. T. & Daellenbach, H. G., 1987. "A comparative evaluation of interactive solution methods for multiple objective decision models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 353-359, June.
    2. Jyrki Wallenius, 1975. "Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(12), pages 1387-1396, August.
    3. Ralph E. Steuer & Joe Silverman & Alan W. Whisman, 1993. "A Combined Tchebycheff/Aspiration Criterion Vector Interactive Multiobjective Programming Procedure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1255-1260, October.
    4. Stanley Zionts & Jyrki Wallenius, 1983. "An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Method for a Class of Underlying Nonlinear Utility Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 519-529, May.
    5. Korhonen, Pekka & Laakso, Jukka, 1986. "Solving generalized goal programming problems using a visual interactive approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 355-363, September.
    6. Jacquet-Lagreze, Eric & Meziani, Rachid & Slowinski, Roman, 1987. "with an interactive assessment of a piecewise linear utility function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 350-357, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Nosal Hoy & Katarzyna Solecka & Andrzej Szarata, 2019. "The Application of the Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Assess Transport Policy Measures Focusing on Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Barbarosoglu, Gulay & Ozdamar, Linet & Cevik, Ahmet, 2002. "An interactive approach for hierarchical analysis of helicopter logistics in disaster relief operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 118-133, July.
    3. Piotr Wojewnik & Tomasz Szapiro, 2010. "Bireference Procedure fBIP for Interactive Multicriteria Optimization with Fuzzy Coefficients," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 2(3), pages 169-193, June.
    4. Miettinen, Kaisa & Molina, Julián & González, Mercedes & Hernández-Díaz, Alfredo & Caballero, Rafael, 2009. "Using box indices in supporting comparison in multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 17-24, August.
    5. Ana Ruiz & Rubén Saborido & Mariano Luque, 2015. "A preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: the weighting achievement scalarizing function genetic algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 101-129, May.
    6. Luque, Mariano & Ruiz, Francisco & Steuer, Ralph E., 2010. "Modified interactive Chebyshev algorithm (MICA) for convex multiobjective programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 557-564, August.
    7. Jaszkiewicz, Andrzej, 2004. "On the computational efficiency of multiple objective metaheuristics. The knapsack problem case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 418-433, October.
    8. Cui, Yunfei & Geng, Zhiqiang & Zhu, Qunxiong & Han, Yongming, 2017. "Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 681-704.
    9. Molina, Julin & Santana, Luis V. & Hernandez-Daz, Alfredo G. & Coello Coello, Carlos A. & Caballero, Rafael, 2009. "g-dominance: Reference point based dominance for multiobjective metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 685-692, September.
    10. Kaliszewski, Ignacy & Miroforidis, Janusz & Podkopaev, Dmitry, 2012. "Interactive Multiple Criteria Decision Making based on preference driven Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization with controllable accuracy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 188-199.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aksoy, Yasemin & Butler, Timothy W. & Minor, Elliott D., 1996. "Comparative studies in interactive multiple objective mathematical programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 408-422, March.
    2. Aloysius, John A. & Davis, Fred D. & Wilson, Darryl D. & Ross Taylor, A. & Kottemann, Jeffrey E., 2006. "User acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: The impact of preference elicitation techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 273-285, February.
    3. Sun, Minghe, 2005. "Some issues in measuring and reporting solution quality of interactive multiple objective programming procedures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 468-483, April.
    4. Siskos, Y. & Spyridakos, A., 1999. "Intelligent multicriteria decision support: Overview and perspectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 236-246, March.
    5. Corner, J. L. & Buchanan, J. T., 1997. "Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 85-97, April.
    6. Alves, Maria Joao & Climaco, Joao, 2007. "A review of interactive methods for multiobjective integer and mixed-integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 99-115, July.
    7. Klimberg, Ronald & Cohen, Robert M., 1999. "Experimental evaluation of a graphical display system to visualizing multiple criteria solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 191-208, November.
    8. Nikolaos Argyris & Alec Morton & José Rui Figueira, 2014. "CUT: A Multicriteria Approach for Concavifiable Preferences," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 633-642, June.
    9. Kalu, Timothy Ch. U., 1999. "An algorithm for systems welfare interactive goal programming modelling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 508-529, August.
    10. M Köksalan & E Karasakal, 2006. "An interactive approach for multiobjective decision making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 532-540, May.
    11. Sun, Minghe & Steuer, Ralph E., 1996. "InterQuad: An interactive quad tree based procedure for solving the discrete alternative multiple criteria problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 462-472, March.
    12. Buchanan, John & Gardiner, Lorraine, 2003. "A comparison of two reference point methods in multiple objective mathematical programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 17-34, August.
    13. Downing, C. E. & Ringuest, J. L., 1998. "An experimental evaluation of the efficacy of four multi-objective linear programming algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 549-558, February.
    14. Yang, Jian-Bo & Sen, Pratyush, 1996. "Preference modelling by estimating local utility functions for multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 115-138, November.
    15. Sahar Mirzaee & David Fannon & Matthias Ruth, 2019. "A comparison of preference elicitation methods for multi-criteria design decisions about resilient and sustainable buildings," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 439-453, December.
    16. Banu Lokman & Murat Köksalan & Pekka J. Korhonen & Jyrki Wallenius, 2016. "An interactive algorithm to find the most preferred solution of multi-objective integer programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 67-95, October.
    17. Manel Baucells & Rakesh K. Sarin, 2003. "Group Decisions with Multiple Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(8), pages 1105-1118, August.
    18. Thomas Kämpke, 1995. "Weak order stability under risk," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(8), pages 1191-1201, December.
    19. Piotr Wojewnik & Tomasz Szapiro, 2010. "Bireference Procedure fBIP for Interactive Multicriteria Optimization with Fuzzy Coefficients," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 2(3), pages 169-193, June.
    20. Corrado Zoppi, 2014. "Does Landscape Protection Really Matter? An Assessment Based on Multicriteria Analysis," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1 Suppl.), pages 47-69.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:113:y:1999:i:2:p:300-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.