IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecosta/v25y2023icp110-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical inference for state occupation and transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models subject to both random left-truncation and right-censoring

Author

Listed:
  • Nießl, Alexandra
  • Allignol, Arthur
  • Beyersmann, Jan
  • Mueller, Carina

Abstract

The Aalen-Johansen estimator generalizes the Kaplan-Meier estimator for independently left-truncated and right-censored survival data to estimate the transition probability matrix of a time-inhomogeneous Markov model with finite state space. Such multi-state models have a wide range of applications for modelling complex courses of a disease over the course of time, but the Markov assumption may often be in doubt. If censoring is entirely unrelated to the multi-state data, it has been suggested that the Aalen-Johansen estimator, standardized by the initial empirical distribution of the multi-state model, still consistently estimates the state occupation probabilities. Recently, this approach has been extended to transition probabilities using landmarking, which is, inter alia, useful for dynamic prediction. However, there have been recent concerns about the mathematical arguments leading to the former result. These findings are complemented in three ways. Firstly, a rigorous proof of consistency of the Aalen-Johansen estimator for state occupation probabilities, on which also correctness of the landmarking approach hinges, is presented correcting and simplifying the earlier result. Secondly, delayed study entry is a common phenomenon in observational studies, and the earlier results are extended to multi-state data also subject to left-truncation. Thirdly, the rigorous proof is suggestive of wild bootstrap resampling. Studying wild bootstrap is motivated by the fact that it is desirable to have a technique that works for models where left-truncation and right-censoring need not be entirely random, then requiring a Markov assumption, and that may still perform reasonably with non-Markov models subject to random left-truncation and right-censoring. The developments for left-truncation are motivated by a prospective observational study on the occurrence and the impact of a multi-resistant infectious organism in patients undergoing surgery. Both the real data example and simulation studies are presented. The case for wild bootstrapping is illustrated for event-driven trials, where the data are censored once a prespecified number of events have been observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nießl, Alexandra & Allignol, Arthur & Beyersmann, Jan & Mueller, Carina, 2023. "Statistical inference for state occupation and transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models subject to both random left-truncation and right-censoring," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 110-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:25:y:2023:i:c:p:110-124
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.09.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306221001155
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Contains open access articles

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.09.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Datta, Somnath & Satten, Glen A., 2001. "Validity of the Aalen-Johansen estimators of stage occupation probabilities and Nelson-Aalen estimators of integrated transition hazards for non-Markov models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 403-411, December.
    2. Tobias Bluhmki & Claudia Schmoor & Dennis Dobler & Markus Pauly & Juergen Finke & Martin Schumacher & Jan Beyersmann, 2018. "A wild bootstrap approach for the Aalen–Johansen estimator," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 977-985, September.
    3. Marcus C. Christiansen & Christian Furrer, 2020. "Dynamics of state-wise prospective reserves in the presence of non-monotone information," Papers 2003.02173, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    4. Niklas Maltzahn & Rune Hoff & Odd O. Aalen & Ingrid S. Mehlum & Hein Putter & Jon Michael Gran, 2021. "A hybrid landmark Aalen-Johansen estimator for transition probabilities in partially non-Markov multi-state models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 737-760, October.
    5. Andrew C. Titman, 2015. "Transition probability estimates for non-Markov multi-state models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1034-1041, December.
    6. David V. Glidden, 2002. "Robust Inference for Event Probabilities with Non-Markov Event Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 361-368, June.
    7. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Furrer, Christian, 2021. "Dynamics of state-wise prospective reserves in the presence of non-monotone information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 81-98.
    8. Jacobo de Uña‐Álvarez & Micha Mandel, 2018. "Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities for a general progressive multi‐state model under cross‐sectional sampling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1203-1212, December.
    9. Per Kragh Andersen & Jules Angst & Henrik Ravn, 2019. "Modeling marginal features in studies of recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 681-695, October.
    10. Jacobo de Uña-Álvarez & Luís Meira-Machado, 2015. "Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities in the non-Markov illness-death model: A comparative study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 364-375, June.
    11. Tobias Bluhmki & Dennis Dobler & Jan Beyersmann & Markus Pauly, 2019. "The wild bootstrap for multivariate Nelson–Aalen estimators," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 97-127, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giorgos Bakoyannis & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2022. "Nonparametric tests for multistate processes with clustered data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(5), pages 837-867, October.
    2. Niklas Maltzahn & Rune Hoff & Odd O. Aalen & Ingrid S. Mehlum & Hein Putter & Jon Michael Gran, 2021. "A hybrid landmark Aalen-Johansen estimator for transition probabilities in partially non-Markov multi-state models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 737-760, October.
    3. Rune Hoff & Hein Putter & Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum & Jon Michael Gran, 2019. "Landmark estimation of transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models with covariates," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 660-680, October.
    4. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Furrer, Christian, 2022. "Extension of as-if-Markov modeling to scaled payments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 288-306.
    5. Jacobo de Uña‐Álvarez & Micha Mandel, 2018. "Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities for a general progressive multi‐state model under cross‐sectional sampling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1203-1212, December.
    6. Gustavo Soutinho & Luís Meira-Machado, 2022. "Methods for checking the Markov condition in multi-state survival data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 751-780, April.
    7. Oliver Lunding Sandqvist, 2023. "A multistate approach to disability insurance reserving with information delays," Papers 2312.14324, arXiv.org.
    8. Jan Beyersmann & Hein Putter, 2014. "A note on computing average state occupation times," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(62), pages 1681-1696.
    9. Jacobo de Uña-Álvarez & Luís Meira-Machado, 2015. "Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities in the non-Markov illness-death model: A comparative study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 364-375, June.
    10. Dennis Dobler & Andrew Titman, 2020. "Dynamic inference for non‐Markov transition probabilities under random right censoring," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(2), pages 572-586, June.
    11. Guibert, Quentin & Planchet, Frédéric, 2018. "Non-parametric inference of transition probabilities based on Aalen–Johansen integral estimators for acyclic multi-state models: application to LTC insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 21-36.
    12. Kristian Buchardt & Christian Furrer & Oliver Lunding Sandqvist, 2022. "Transaction time models in multi-state life insurance," Papers 2209.06902, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    13. Arthur Allignol & Martin Schumacher & Jan Beyersmann, 2011. "Estimating summary functionals in multistate models with an application to hospital infection data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 181-197, June.
    14. Julie K. Furberg & Per K. Andersen & Sofie Korn & Morten Overgaard & Henrik Ravn, 2023. "Bivariate pseudo-observations for recurrent event analysis with terminal events," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 256-287, April.
    15. Gustavo Soutinho & Luís Meira-Machado, 2023. "Nonparametric estimation of the distribution of gap times for recurrent events," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 103-128, March.
    16. J. Feifel & D. Dobler, 2021. "Dynamic inference in general nested case‐control designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 175-185, March.
    17. Richard J. Cook & Jerald F. Lawless & Bingfeng Xie, 2022. "Marker-dependent observation and carry-forward of internal covariates in Cox regression," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 560-584, October.
    18. Ritesh Ramchandani & Dianne M. Finkelstein & David A. Schoenfeld, 2020. "Estimation for an accelerated failure time model with intermediate states as auxiliary information," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Arthur Berg & Dimitris Politis & Kagba Suaray & Hui Zeng, 2020. "Reduced bias nonparametric lifetime density and hazard estimation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(3), pages 704-727, September.
    20. Somnath Datta & Glen A. Satten, 2002. "Estimation of Integrated Transition Hazards and Stage Occupation Probabilities for Non-Markov Systems Under Dependent Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 792-802, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:25:y:2023:i:c:p:110-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/econometrics-and-statistics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.