IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/lifeda/v29y2023i2d10.1007_s10985-021-09533-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bivariate pseudo-observations for recurrent event analysis with terminal events

Author

Listed:
  • Julie K. Furberg

    (Biostatistics GLP-1 and CV 1, Novo Nordisk A/S)

  • Per K. Andersen

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • Sofie Korn

    (Biostatistics 1, LEO Pharma A/S)

  • Morten Overgaard

    (Aarhus University)

  • Henrik Ravn

    (Biostatistics GLP-1 and CV 1, Novo Nordisk A/S)

Abstract

The analysis of recurrent events in the presence of terminal events requires special attention. Several approaches have been suggested for such analyses either using intensity models or marginal models. When analysing treatment effects on recurrent events in controlled trials, special attention should be paid to competing deaths and their impact on interpretation. This paper proposes a method that formulates a marginal model for recurrent events and terminal events simultaneously. Estimation is based on pseudo-observations for both the expected number of events and survival probabilities. Various relevant hypothesis tests in the framework are explored. Theoretical derivations and simulation studies are conducted to investigate the behaviour of the method. The method is applied to two real data examples. The bivariate marginal pseudo-observation model carries the strength of a two-dimensional modelling procedure and performs well in comparison with available models. Finally, an extension to a three-dimensional model, which decomposes the terminal event per death cause, is proposed and exemplified.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie K. Furberg & Per K. Andersen & Sofie Korn & Morten Overgaard & Henrik Ravn, 2023. "Bivariate pseudo-observations for recurrent event analysis with terminal events," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 256-287, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:29:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10985-021-09533-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10985-021-09533-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10985-021-09533-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10985-021-09533-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klemen Pavlič & Torben Martinussen & Per Kragh Andersen, 2019. "Goodness of fit tests for estimating equations based on pseudo-observations," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 189-205, April.
    2. Debashis Ghosh & D. Y. Lin, 2000. "Nonparametric Analysis of Recurrent Events and Death," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 554-562, June.
    3. Lei Liu & Robert A. Wolfe & Xuelin Huang, 2004. "Shared Frailty Models for Recurrent Events and a Terminal Event," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 747-756, September.
    4. D. Y. Lin & L. J. Wei & I. Yang & Z. Ying, 2000. "Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of recurrent events," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(4), pages 711-730.
    5. Per Kragh Andersen, 2003. "Generalised linear models for correlated pseudo-observations, with applications to multi-state models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(1), pages 15-27, March.
    6. Per Kragh Andersen & Jules Angst & Henrik Ravn, 2019. "Modeling marginal features in studies of recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 681-695, October.
    7. Martin Jacobsen & Torben Martinussen, 2016. "A Note on the Large Sample Properties of Estimators Based on Generalized Linear Models for Correlated Pseudo-observations," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(3), pages 845-862, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianyu Zhan & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2019. "Semiparametric temporal process regression of survival-out-of-hospital," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 322-340, April.
    2. Xiaowei Sun & Jieli Ding & Liuquan Sun, 2020. "A semiparametric additive rates model for the weighted composite endpoint of recurrent and terminal events," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 471-492, July.
    3. Qing Pan & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2009. "Flexible Estimation of Differences in Treatment-Specific Recurrent Event Means in the Presence of a Terminating Event," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 753-761, September.
    4. Miao Han & Liuquan Sun & Yutao Liu & Jun Zhu, 2018. "Joint analysis of recurrent event data with additive–multiplicative hazards model for the terminal event time," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(5), pages 523-547, July.
    5. Tianmeng Lyu & Björn Bornkamp & Guenther Mueller‐Velten & Heinz Schmidli, 2023. "Bayesian inference for a principal stratum estimand on recurrent events truncated by death," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3792-3802, December.
    6. Gongjun Xu & Sy Han Chiou & Chiung-Yu Huang & Mei-Cheng Wang & Jun Yan, 2017. "Joint Scale-Change Models for Recurrent Events and Failure Time," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 794-805, April.
    7. Xingqiu Zhao & Jie Zhou & Liuquan Sun, 2011. "Semiparametric Transformation Models with Time-Varying Coefficients for Recurrent and Terminal Events," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 404-414, June.
    8. Yassin Mazroui & Audrey Mauguen & Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier & Gaetan MacGrogan & Véronique Brouste & Virginie Rondeau, 2016. "Time-varying coefficients in a multivariate frailty model: Application to breast cancer recurrences of several types and death," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 191-215, April.
    9. Per Kragh Andersen & Jules Angst & Henrik Ravn, 2019. "Modeling marginal features in studies of recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 681-695, October.
    10. Yining Ye & John D. Kalbfleisch & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2007. "Semiparametric Analysis of Correlated Recurrent and Terminal Events," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 78-87, March.
    11. Xiaoyu Che & John Angus, 2016. "A new joint model of recurrent event data with the additive hazards model for the terminal event time," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(7), pages 763-787, October.
    12. Giuliana Cortese & Thomas H. Scheike, 2022. "Efficient estimation of the marginal mean of recurrent events," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1787-1821, November.
    13. Xiaoyu Wang & Liuquan Sun, 2023. "Joint modeling of generalized scale-change models for recurrent event and failure time data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-33, January.
    14. C.-Y. Huang & J. Qin & M.-C. Wang, 2010. "Semiparametric Analysis for Recurrent Event Data with Time-Dependent Covariates and Informative Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 39-49, March.
    15. Li, Yang & Zhao, Hui & Sun, Jianguo & Kim, KyungMann, 2014. "Nonparametric tests for panel count data with unequal observation processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 103-111.
    16. Erik T. Parner & Per K. Andersen & Morten Overgaard, 2020. "Cumulative risk regression in case–cohort studies using pseudo-observations," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 639-658, October.
    17. Kwun Chuen Gary Chan & Mei-Cheng Wang, 2017. "Semiparametric Modeling and Estimation of the Terminal Behavior of Recurrent Marker Processes Before Failure Events," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(517), pages 351-362, January.
    18. Dongxiao Han & Xiaogang Su & Liuquan Sun & Zhou Zhang & Lei Liu, 2020. "Variable selection in joint frailty models of recurrent and terminal events," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1330-1339, December.
    19. Xuelin Huang & Lei Liu, 2007. "A Joint Frailty Model for Survival and Gap Times Between Recurrent Events," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 389-397, June.
    20. Donglin Zeng & D. Y. Lin, 2009. "Semiparametric Transformation Models with Random Effects for Joint Analysis of Recurrent and Terminal Events," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 746-752, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:29:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10985-021-09533-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.