IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v36y2019ic1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A dynamic eco-compensation standard for Hani Rice Terraces System in southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Moucheng
  • Liu, Weiwei
  • Yang, Lun
  • Jiao, Wenjun
  • He, Siyuan
  • Min, Qingwen

Abstract

Agricultural land provides not only food and fiber, but also various non-market commodities with characteristics of externalities or public goods. However, more and more chemical inputs lead to frequent environmental pollution. Thus, in order to incentivise farmers to engage in ecological agriculture to provide more ecosystem services, it’s necessary to pay farmers for their loss to change current cultivation approach. This paper studied Hani Rice Terraces System in southwest China, and calculated how much should be paid for paddy eco-compensation based on the subjective decision-making characteristics of individuals and characteristics of a paddy ecosystem. On the one hand, from the perspective of the microeconomic decision-making done by the individual farmers, we investigated the space distribution of the opportunity cost for paddy ecosystem services supply; on the other hand, from the perspective of farmers’ macroeconomic behaviors, we investigated the relationship between the compensation standard and the ecosystem services willingly provided by the farmers. For example, when we need more ecosystem services (80.77 × 104 yuan/ha/yr), the compensation standard is 3000 yuan/ha/yr; when the demand of ecosystem services is to add 219.49 × 104 yuan/ha/yr, the compensation standard should be 9000 yuan/ha/yr.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Moucheng & Liu, Weiwei & Yang, Lun & Jiao, Wenjun & He, Siyuan & Min, Qingwen, 2019. "A dynamic eco-compensation standard for Hani Rice Terraces System in southwest China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:36:y:2019:i:c:1
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041618300731
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Gao & Ziyan Han & Yanzhi Cui & Hanbing Zhang & Lulu Liu, 2019. "Determination of the Agricultural Eco-Compensation Standards in Ecological Fragile Poverty Areas Based on Emergy Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Zhen, Huayang & Gao, Wenzeng & Yuan, Kai & Ju, Xuehai & Qiao, Yuhui, 2021. "Internalizing externalities through net ecosystem service analysis–A case study of greenhouse vegetable farms in Beijing," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    3. Xue, Jibin & Lang, Jiahui & Guan, Yanjun & Lu, Shibao, 2023. "Design and measurement of small-scale regional ecological compensation model," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1392-1405.
    4. Zhe Chen & Apurbo Sarkar & Ahmed Khairul Hasan & Xiaojing Li & Xianli Xia, 2021. "Evaluation of Farmers’ Ecological Cognition in Responses to Specialty Orchard Fruit Planting Behavior: Evidence in Shaanxi and Ningxia, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Zhidong Li & Boru Su & Moucheng Liu, 2022. "Research Progress on the Theory and Practice of Grassland Eco-Compensation in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Zhen, Huayang & Qiao, Yuhui & Zhao, Haijun & Ju, Xuehai & Zanoli, Raffaele & Waqas, Muhammad Ahmed & Lun, Fei & Knudsen, Marie Trydeman, 2022. "Developing a conceptual model to quantify eco-compensation based on environmental and economic cost-benefit analysis for promoting the ecologically intensified agriculture," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:36:y:2019:i:c:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.