IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v507y2025ics0304380025001589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk prediction and zoning: Taking Fujian province as an example

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Fan
  • Wu, Yun
  • Zhang, Yao
  • Wang, Jiawei
  • Xue, Zhijie
  • Tan, Xin
  • Jia, Wen

Abstract

Rapid urbanization drives urban expansion while threatening sustainable development through declining ecosystem service value (ESV) and rising ecological risk (ERI). This study developed an integrated SD-PLUS model combining historical analysis and future projections to evaluate ESV-ERI dynamics, establishing ecological zoning frameworks with policy implications. Using Fujian Province as a testbed, we established a Business-as-Usual (BAU) scenario through historical pattern extrapolation, compliant with EEA technical guidelines to create a policy-neutral baseline. This framework enables quantitative evaluation of anthropogenic regulation effects and early identification of ecological risk thresholds. Our simulations reveal over 15 years, construction land expanded by 48% (1757.42 km²), primarily through forest and farmland conversion. ESV showed initial growth followed by decline, exhibiting southeast-northwest spatial gradients (lower SE, higher NW). Conversely, ERI progressively increased with medium-high risk transitions, displaying inverse spatial concentration (high SE, low NW). Model validation showed strong performance with SD prediction errors <5% and PLUS simulations achieving Kappa=0.90/accuracy=0.94, confirming SD-PLUS effectiveness in land change modeling. Spatial analysis identified four functional ecological zones: 1) expanding strict control zones (high ERI), 2) key control zones showing initial expansion then contraction, 3) stable general control zones, and 4) continuously shrinking ecological protection zones (high ESV). These findings enable targeted spatial governance by aligning economic development with ecological conservation priorities. The integrated methodology provides policymakers with a scientifically robust framework for balancing urban growth with ecosystem preservation, particularly valuable for rapidly developing regions facing similar sustainability challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Fan & Wu, Yun & Zhang, Yao & Wang, Jiawei & Xue, Zhijie & Tan, Xin & Jia, Wen, 2025. "Research on ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk prediction and zoning: Taking Fujian province as an example," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 507(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:507:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001589
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001589
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bo Wen & Biao Zeng & Yu Dun & Xiaorui Jin & Yuchuan Zhao & Chao Wu & Xia Tian & Shijun Zhen, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of LULC Change and Ecosystem Service Value in Guangdong: A Perspective of Food Security," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:507:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.