IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i14p1467-d1697520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of LULC Change and Ecosystem Service Value in Guangdong: A Perspective of Food Security

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Wen

    (College of Land Science and Spatial Planning, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Biao Zeng

    (College of Land Science and Spatial Planning, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Yu Dun

    (Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Key Laboratory of Groundwater Remediation of Hebei Province & China Geological Survey, Key Laboratory of Groundwater Contamination and Remediation, Hebei Province & China Geological Survey, Shijiazhuang 050061, China)

  • Xiaorui Jin

    (The First Geological Brigade of Hebei Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Exploration, Handan 056000, China)

  • Yuchuan Zhao

    (Hebei Geological Environment Monitoring Institute, Shijiazhuang 050022, China)

  • Chao Wu

    (Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Key Laboratory of Groundwater Remediation of Hebei Province & China Geological Survey, Key Laboratory of Groundwater Contamination and Remediation, Hebei Province & China Geological Survey, Shijiazhuang 050061, China)

  • Xia Tian

    (Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Key Laboratory of Groundwater Remediation of Hebei Province & China Geological Survey, Key Laboratory of Groundwater Contamination and Remediation, Hebei Province & China Geological Survey, Shijiazhuang 050061, China)

  • Shijun Zhen

    (Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Key Laboratory of Groundwater Remediation of Hebei Province & China Geological Survey, Key Laboratory of Groundwater Contamination and Remediation, Hebei Province & China Geological Survey, Shijiazhuang 050061, China)

Abstract

Amid global efforts to balance sustainable development and food security, ecosystem service value (ESV), a critical bridge between natural systems and human well-being, has gained increasing importance. This study explores the spatiotemporal dynamics and driving factors of land use changes and ESV from a food security perspective, aiming to inform synergies between ecological protection and food production for regional sustainability. Using Guangdong Province as a case study, we analyze ESV patterns and spatial correlations from 2005 to 2023 based on three-phase land use and socioeconomic datasets. Key findings: I. Forestland and cropland dominate Guangdong’s land use, which is marked by the expansion of construction land and the shrinking of agricultural and forest areas. II. Overall ESV declined slightly: northern ecological zones remained stable, while eastern/western regions saw mild decreases, with cropland loss threatening grain self-sufficiency. III. Irrigation scale, forestry output, and fertilizer use exhibited strong interactive effects on ESV, whereas urban hierarchy influenced ESV independently. IV. ESV showed significant positive spatial autocorrelation, with stable agglomeration patterns across the province. The research provides policy insights for optimizing cropland protection and enhancing coordination between food production spaces and ecosystem services, while offering theoretical support for land use regulation and agricultural resilience in addressing regional food security challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Wen & Biao Zeng & Yu Dun & Xiaorui Jin & Yuchuan Zhao & Chao Wu & Xia Tian & Shijun Zhen, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of LULC Change and Ecosystem Service Value in Guangdong: A Perspective of Food Security," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:14:p:1467-:d:1697520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/14/1467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/14/1467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qinglan Li & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao & Qing He, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Impacts of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case from Guiyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S. & Sachet, Erwan & Vanegas, Martha & Piispanen, Kyle, 2016. "Are the major imperatives of food security missing in ecosystem services research?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 19-31.
    3. Geijzendorffer, Ilse R. & Cohen-Shacham, Emmanuelle & Cord, Anna F. & Cramer, Wolfgang & Guerra, Carlos & Martín-López, Berta, 2017. "Ecosystem services in global sustainability policies," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 40-48.
    4. Dai, Zhen-Zhong & Chang, Sen & Zhao, Guo-Rong & Duan, Jia-Jia & Liang, Hao-Yuan & Zhu, Zhi-Yuan & Liu, Sheng-Li & Feng, Yong-Zhong & Wang, Xing, 2025. "Unlocking China's grain yield potential: Harnessing technological and spatial synergies in diverse cropping systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Wenfeng Hu & Junhao Cheng & Mengtian Zheng & Xiaolong Jin & Junqiang Yao & Fei Guo, 2025. "A Multi-Scenario Simulation and Driving Factor Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Land in China’s Main Grain Producing Areas: A Case Study of the Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Ziyun Wang & Huaijun Wang & Zhenjie Liu & Ru Feng & Yingping Pan, 2023. "Evolution of Ecosystem Service Values and the Response to Landscape Pattern Change in the Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Wang, Fan & Wu, Yun & Zhang, Yao & Wang, Jiawei & Xue, Zhijie & Tan, Xin & Jia, Wen, 2025. "Research on ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk prediction and zoning: Taking Fujian province as an example," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 507(C).
    8. Gökçe Koç & Ayşe Uzmay, 2024. "Construction of a Farm-Level Food Security Index: Case Study of Turkish Dairy Farms," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 687-714, November.
    9. Ying Pan & Jiayu Bai & Sam Turner, 2023. "History in Points, Lines and Polygons: Time Depth in the Landscape of Guangdong Province, Southern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aibo Jin & Gachen Zhang & Ping Ma & Xiangrong Wang, 2024. "Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in the Chaohu Lake Basin Based on Land-Use Scenario Simulations," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, December.
    2. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Montoya, Daniel & Gaba, Sabrina & de Mazancourt, Claire & Bretagnolle, Vincent & Loreau, Michel, 2020. "Reconciling biodiversity conservation, food production and farmers’ demand in agricultural landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 416(C).
    4. Ahammad, Ronju & Stacey, Natasha & Sunderland, Terry, 2021. "Analysis of forest-related policies for supporting ecosystem services-based forest management in Bangladesh," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    5. Mostafa Shaaban & Carmen Schwartz & Joseph Macpherson & Annette Piorr, 2021. "A Conceptual Model Framework for Mapping, Analyzing and Managing Supply–Demand Mismatches of Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Lehmann, Ina & Martin, Adrian & Fisher, Janet A., 2018. "Why Should Ecosystem Services Be Governed to Support Poverty Alleviation? Philosophical Perspectives on Positions in the Empirical Literature," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 265-273.
    7. Wisely, Samantha M. & Alexander, Kathleen & Mahlaba, Themb'a & Cassidy, Lin, 2018. "Linking ecosystem services to livelihoods in southern Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PC), pages 339-341.
    8. Andrieu, N. & Blundo-Canto, G. & Cruz-Garcia, G.S., 2019. "Trade-offs between food security and forest exploitation by mestizo households in Ucayali, Peruvian Amazon," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.
    9. Elaine Aparecida Rodrigues & Maurício Lamano Ferreira & Amanda Rodrigues de Carvalho & José Oscar William Vega Bustillos & Rodrigo Antonio Braga Moraes Victor & Marcelo Gomes Sodré & Delvonei Alves de, 2022. "Land, Water, and Climate Issues in Large and Megacities under the Lens of Nuclear Science: An Approach for Achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG11)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Blundo-Canto, Genowefa & Bax, Vincent & Quintero, Marcela & Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S. & Groeneveld, Rolf A. & Perez-Marulanda, Lisset, 2018. "The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 160-183.
    11. Rachita Gupta & Ravi Shankar & Kee-Hung Lai & Ajay Kumar, 2025. "Risk profiling of food security impediments using decision maker’s behavioural preference towards operational risk management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(2), pages 937-972, May.
    12. Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S. & Sachet, Erwan & Blundo-Canto, Genowefa & Vanegas, Martha & Quintero, Marcela, 2017. "To what extent have the links between ecosystem services and human well-being been researched in Africa, Asia, and Latin America?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 201-212.
    13. Schmidt, Stefan & Seppelt, Ralf, 2018. "Information content of global ecosystem service databases and their suitability for decision advice," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 22-40.
    14. Wenzhu Zhou & Dawei Wang & Yiwen Zhang & Hanjing Xu, 2025. "Predicting Rural Industrial Transformation via Coupling Coordination Between Polder-Based Spatial Features and Industrial Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Burdon, D. & Potts, T. & McKinley, E. & Lew, S. & Shilland, R. & Gormley, K. & Thomson, S. & Forster, R., 2019. "Expanding the role of participatory mapping to assess ecosystem service provision in local coastal environments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    16. Qing Liu & Yaoyao Zhao & Shuhai Zhuo & Yixian Mo & Peng Zhou, 2025. "Prediction of Ecological Zoning and Optimization Strategies Based on Ecosystem Service Value and Ecological Risk," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, September.
    17. Yidan Liu & Xiaojun Yao & Zhijuan Tian & Yingying Zhang, 2024. "Evaluation of the Importance of Ecological Service Function and Analysis of Influencing Factors in the Hexi Corridor from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Balázsi, Ágnes & Dänhardt, Juliana & Collins, Sue & Schweiger, Oliver & Settele, Josef & Hartel, Tibor, 2021. "Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands: Expert survey in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Schröter, Matthias & Kraemer, Roland & Mantel, Martin & Kabisch, Nadja & Hecker, Susanne & Richter, Anett & Neumeier, Veronika & Bonn, Aletta, 2017. "Citizen science for assessing ecosystem services: Status, challenges and opportunities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 80-94.
    20. Di Zhan & Bin Quan & Jia Liao, 2025. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Coupling Coordination of LUCC and Landscape Ecological Risk in Ecologically Vulnerable Areas: A Case Study of the Wanzhou–Dazhou–Kaizhou Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-25, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:14:p:1467-:d:1697520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.