IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v498y2024ics0304380024002527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real world data for real world problems: Importance of appropriate spatial resolution modelling to inform decision makers in marine management

Author

Listed:
  • Riley, Tanya G
  • Mouat, Beth
  • Shucksmith, Rachel

Abstract

Effective management of marine ecosystems requires informed decision-making based on accurate, comprehensive and appropriate data. Mapping habitats can form an important part of these processes so that decision makers can ensure the pressures exerted by human activities can be assessed while considering the sensitivity of the environment. Predictive models can be utilised to understand the distribution of species and habitats (e.g. biotopes) without incurring the expense of wide scale surveys. If predictive models are used in decision-making care must be taken in interpreting model results. The spatial resolution at which habitat modelling is conducted can greatly influence the decision outcomes. Whilst national resolution habitat maps serve as valuable resources for informing overarching policy making, for development level decisions fine resolution habitat information is needed. This paper explores the importance of spatial resolution modelling in marine management decision-making processes, using four spatial resolutions (50 m, 100 m, 200 m and 500 m) to model the presence of a protected habitat, maerl beds, within the Fetlar-Haroldswick Marine Protected Area in the Shetland Islands, Scotland. Outputs were compared for model performance between the resolutions and area of modelled maerl bed coverage. Simulations of real-world marine activities, explore the magnitude of overlap attributable to varied spatial resolution models, with an emphasis on the presumed ‘need’ for management. This study shows the importance of considering spatial resolution in modelling outputs and highlights the challenges associated with using models to guide decision-making, direct pressures on protected habitats, and cumulative impacts. It carries significance for maximising economic opportunity while safeguarding marine features. For real-world applications coarse resolution data may suffice for strategic, large-scale decisions, but finer resolutions are imperative for consenting or managing individual marine activities. By emphasising the need for appropriate spatial resolution modelling, these findings contribute to the development of sustainable management strategies that are appropriate to the scale of the decision. Addressing the complexities of real-world decision-making and understanding the magnitude of spatial resolution required for the marine environment are a crucial principle that can also enhance and be applied to other disciplines including, terrestrial ecology, urban planning and the assessment of potential climate change impacts. Failing to model appropriately means that real-world pressures and impacts occurring on a finer scale then the available data may have their impacts over or underestimated, hindering effective governance. Whilst we are striving to meet our national and international obligations and objectives through effective marine governance, this paper highlights the challenges of real-world decision-making where data is not yet available at a suitable resolution to address these issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Riley, Tanya G & Mouat, Beth & Shucksmith, Rachel, 2024. "Real world data for real world problems: Importance of appropriate spatial resolution modelling to inform decision makers in marine management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:498:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024002527
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002527
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110864?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shucksmith, Rachel J. & Kelly, Christina, 2014. "Data collection and mapping – Principles, processes and application in marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 27-33.
    2. Gill Ward & Trevor Hastie & Simon Barry & Jane Elith & John R. Leathwick, 2009. "Presence-Only Data and the EM Algorithm," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 554-563, June.
    3. Fernandez, Marc & Sillero, Neftali & Yesson, Chris, 2022. "To be or not to be: the role of absences in niche modelling for highly mobile species in dynamic marine environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    4. Douvere, Fanny, 2008. "The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 762-771, September.
    5. Lorena Ribeiro de A Carneiro & Albertina P Lima & Ricardo B Machado & William E Magnusson, 2016. "Limitations to the Use of Species-Distribution Models for Environmental-Impact Assessments in the Amazon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qu, Yang & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Huang, Junling & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Development of a computable general equilibrium model based on integrated macroeconomic framework for ocean multi-use between offshore wind farms and fishing activities in Scotland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    2. Emilio Salas-Leiton & Ana Costa & Vanessa Neves & Joana Soares & Adriano Bordalo & Sérgia Costa-Dias, 2022. "Sustainability of the Portuguese North-Western Fishing Activity in the Face of the Recently Implemented Maritime Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Lauer, Peter & López, Lambertus & Sloan, Emmanuelle & Sloan, Sean & Doroudi, Mehdi, 2015. "Learning from the systematic approach to aquaculture zoning in South Australia: A case study of aquaculture (Zones – Lower Eyre Peninsula) Policy 2013," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 77-84.
    4. Schwemmer, Philipp & Güpner, Franziska & Adler, Sven & Klingbeil, Knut & Garthe, Stefan, 2016. "Modelling small-scale foraging habitat use in breeding Eurasian oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) in relation to prey distribution and environmental predictors," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 322-333.
    5. Barham A. HamadAmin & Nabaz R. Khwarahm, 2023. "Mapping Impacts of Climate Change on the Distributions of Two Endemic Tree Species under Socioeconomic Pathway Scenarios (SSP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Campbell, Maria S. & Stehfest, Kilian M. & Votier, Stephen C. & Hall-Spencer, Jason M., 2014. "Mapping fisheries for marine spatial planning: Gear-specific vessel monitoring system (VMS), marine conservation and offshore renewable energy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 293-300.
    7. Lu, Wen-Hai & Liu, Jie & Xiang, Xian-Quan & Song, Wei-Ling & McIlgorm, Alistair, 2015. "A comparison of marine spatial planning approaches in China: Marine functional zoning and the marine ecological red line," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 94-101.
    8. Ralph V Tafon, 2018. "Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(2), pages 258-273, March.
    9. Frazão Santos, Catarina & Domingos, Tiago & Ferreira, Maria Adelaide & Orbach, Michael & Andrade, Francisco, 2014. "How sustainable is sustainable marine spatial planning? Part I—Linking the concepts," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 59-65.
    10. Flannery, Wesley & O’Hagan, Anne Marie & O’Mahony, Cathal & Ritchie, Heather & Twomey, Sarah, 2015. "Evaluating conditions for transboundary Marine Spatial Planning: Challenges and opportunities on the island of Ireland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 86-95.
    11. Meirui Li & Baolei Zhang & Xiaobo Zhang & Shumin Zhang & Le Yin, 2023. "Exploring Spatio-Temporal Variations of Ecological Risk in the Yellow River Ecological Economic Belt Based on an Improved Landscape Index Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Olsen, Stephen B. & McCann, Jennifer H. & Fugate, Grover, 2014. "The State of Rhode Island's pioneering marine spatial plan," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 26-38.
    13. Herkt, K. Matthias B. & Barnikel, Günter & Skidmore, Andrew K. & Fahr, Jakob, 2016. "A high-resolution model of bat diversity and endemism for continental Africa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 9-28.
    14. Carolyn K Robb, 2014. "Assessing the Impact of Human Activities on British Columbia’s Estuaries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
    15. Quero García, Pablo & Chica Ruiz, Juan Adolfo & García Sanabria, Javier, 2020. "Blue energy and marine spatial planning in Southern Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    16. Joanna Vince, 2015. "Integrated policy approaches and policy failure: the case of Australia’s Oceans Policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(2), pages 159-180, June.
    17. Brennan, Jonathon & Fitzsimmons, Clare & Gray, Tim & Raggatt, Laura, 2014. "EU marine strategy framework directive (MSFD) and marine spatial planning (MSP): Which is the more dominant and practicable contributor to maritime policy in the UK?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 359-366.
    18. Werner, Sandra R. & Spurgeon, James P.G. & Isaksen, Gary H. & Smith, Joseph P. & Springer, Nina K. & Gettleson, David A. & N׳Guessan, Lucie & Dupont, Jennifer M., 2014. "Rapid prioritization of marine ecosystem services and ecosystem indicators," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 178-189.
    19. Erard Brian, 2022. "Modeling Qualitative Outcomes by Supplementing Participant Data with General Population Data: A New and More Versatile Approach," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 35-53, January.
    20. Sophal Chhun & Viktoria Kahui & Henrik Moller & Paul Thorsnes, 2015. "Advancing Marine Policy Toward Ecosystem-Based Management by Eliciting Public Preferences," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(3), pages 261-275.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:498:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024002527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.