IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v485y2023ics0304380023002296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The integration of hierarchical levels of scale in tree species distribution models of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in mountain forests

Author

Listed:
  • Simon, Alois
  • Katzensteiner, Klaus
  • Wallentin, Gudrun

Abstract

Taking into account and combining different levels of scale is essential in species distribution models when it comes to the investigation of the environmental niche of a species. The study focuses on two levels of spatial extent, on the one hand the continental level of Europe, and on the other hand the regional level of the federal state of Tyrol in Austria. Mountain forests in the European Alps cover the inner Alpine distribution margins of several tree species and therefore are particularly well-suited to reveal the predictive power of climate, soil, and topographic variables on the shaping of these margins. The potential occurrence of the two investigated tree species, Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica, is an important criterion for the delineation of elevational vegetation zones in forest site classification systems and was modelled with Deep Neural Networks. In the process, we observed a strong imbalance of absence and presence records at the continental level and evaluated different methods to address this issue. The potential predictor variables for species distribution modelling at the different spatial extents were grouped into climate, soil, and topographic information. The combination of the different hierarchical levels of extent and associated spatial resolution was implemented by using the outputs of the continental model as a predictor variable in the regional model. The binary classification of the 30% test dataset showed a True Skill Statistic of 0.73 to 0.76 for the regional level and 0.5 to 0.74 for the continental level, with slightly higher values for F. sylvatica than for A. alba. For both species and extent levels, the climate predictor group showed the greatest contribution (81 to 96%) to the models’ predictive power. At the regional level, climate was followed by soil and then topographic predictor groups. At the continental level however, topography showed stronger effects than soil information. In most cases, the consideration of soil information along climatic gradients led to an increase in the occurrence probability at the climatic distribution margins. There is evidence that soil conditions are more important in determining the inner Alpine distribution margins for F. sylvatica than for A. alba. To improve species distribution models at the regional level, e.g. in the Alpine area, a focus on soil information is proposed. In general, models which combine continental and regional data are preferable.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon, Alois & Katzensteiner, Klaus & Wallentin, Gudrun, 2023. "The integration of hierarchical levels of scale in tree species distribution models of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 485(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:485:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023002296
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023002296
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sillero, Neftalí & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Enriquez‐Urzelai, Urtzi & Vale, Cândida Gomes & Sousa-Guedes, Diana & Martínez-Freiría, Fernando & Real, Raimundo & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2021. "Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    2. Freeman, Elizabeth A. & Moisen, Gretchen, 2008. "PresenceAbsence: An R Package for Presence Absence Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 23(i11).
    3. Benjamin Deneu & Maximilien Servajean & Pierre Bonnet & Christophe Botella & François Munoz & Alexis Joly, 2021. "Convolutional neural networks improve species distribution modelling by capturing the spatial structure of the environment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Sor, Ratha & Park, Young-Seuk & Boets, Pieter & Goethals, Peter L.M. & Lek, Sovan, 2017. "Effects of species prevalence on the performance of predictive models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 11-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sillero, Neftalí & Campos, João Carlos & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2023. "A curated list of R packages for ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    2. Vorpahl, Peter & Elsenbeer, Helmut & Märker, Michael & Schröder, Boris, 2012. "How can statistical models help to determine driving factors of landslides?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 27-39.
    3. Marchetto, Elisa & Da Re, Daniele & Tordoni, Enrico & Bazzichetto, Manuele & Zannini, Piero & Celebrin, Simone & Chieffallo, Ludovico & Malavasi, Marco & Rocchini, Duccio, 2023. "Testing the effect of sample prevalence and sampling methods on probability- and favourability-based SDMs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    4. Akpoti, Komlavi & Groen, Thomas & Dossou-Yovo, Elliott & Kabo-bah, Amos T. & Zwart, Sander J., 2022. "Climate change-induced reduction in agricultural land suitability of West-Africa's inland valley landscapes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Barker, Justin R. & MacIsaac, Hugh J., 2022. "Species distribution models applied to mosquitoes: Use, quality assessment, and recommendations for best practice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    6. Pliscoff, Patricio & Luebert, Federico & Hilger, Hartmut H. & Guisan, Antoine, 2014. "Effects of alternative sets of climatic predictors on species distribution models and associated estimates of extinction risk: A test with plants in an arid environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 166-177.
    7. Freeman, Elizabeth A. & Moisen, Gretchen G., 2008. "A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and kappa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 48-58.
    8. Fernandez, Marc & Sillero, Neftali & Yesson, Chris, 2022. "To be or not to be: the role of absences in niche modelling for highly mobile species in dynamic marine environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    9. Amanda West & Sunil Kumar & Catherine Jarnevich, 2016. "Regional modeling of large wildfires under current and potential future climates in Colorado and Wyoming, USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 565-577, February.
    10. Ehara, Makoto & Matsuura, Toshiya & Gong, Hao & Sokh, Heng & Leng, Chivin & Choeung, Hong Narith & Sem, Rida & Nomura, Hisako & Tsuyama, Ikutaro & Matsui, Tetsuya & Hyakumura, Kimihiko, 2023. "Where do people vulnerable to deforestation live? Triaging forest conservation interventions for sustainable non-timber forest products," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Jonathan O. Hernandez & Inocencio E. Buot & Byung Bae Park, 2022. "Prioritizing Choices in the Conservation of Flora and Fauna: Research Trends and Methodological Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Tikka, Ville & Haapaniemi, Jouni & Räisänen, Otto & Honkapuro, Samuli, 2022. "Convolutional neural networks in estimating the spatial distribution of electric vehicles to support electricity grid planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    13. Freeman, Elizabeth A. & Moisen, Gretchen G. & Frescino, Tracey S., 2012. "Evaluating effectiveness of down-sampling for stratified designs and unbalanced prevalence in Random Forest models of tree species distributions in Nevada," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 233(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Mestre, Frederico & Pita, Ricardo & Paupério, Joana & Martins, Filipa M.S. & Alves, Paulo Célio & Mira, António & Beja, Pedro, 2015. "Combining distribution modelling and non-invasive genetics to improve range shift forecasting," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 171-179.
    15. Lu, Na & Niu, Jun & Kang, Shaozhong & Singh, Shailesh Kumar & Du, Taisheng, 2021. "A hybrid PCA-SEM-ANN model for the prediction of water use efficiency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 460(C).
    16. Amanda M. West & Sunil Kumar & Catherine S. Jarnevich, 2016. "Regional modeling of large wildfires under current and potential future climates in Colorado and Wyoming, USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 565-577, February.
    17. Maria, Bobrowski & Udo, Schickhoff, 2017. "Why input matters: Selection of climate data sets for modelling the potential distribution of a treeline species in the Himalayan region," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 92-102.
    18. Benkendorf, Donald J. & Schwartz, Samuel D. & Cutler, D. Richard & Hawkins, Charles P., 2023. "Correcting for the effects of class imbalance improves the performance of machine-learning based species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    19. Koo, Kyung Ah & Kong, Woo-Seok & Park, Seon Uk & Lee, Joon Ho & Kim, Jaeuk & Jung, Huicheul, 2017. "Sensitivity of Korean fir (Abies koreana Wils.), a threatened climate relict species, to increasing temperature at an island subalpine area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 353(C), pages 5-16.
    20. Caradima, Bogdan & Scheidegger, Andreas & Brodersen, Jakob & Schuwirth, Nele, 2021. "Bridging mechanistic conceptual models and statistical species distribution models of riverine fish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:485:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023002296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.