IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v481y2023ics0304380023000741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience, indirect effects and cycling in ecological networks

Author

Listed:
  • Kazanci, Caner
  • Ma, Qianqian
  • Basheer, Aladeen Al
  • Azizi, Asma

Abstract

Indirect effects index (IEI) and cycling index (FCI) are two key measures of ecological network analysis that are known to be correlated. Systems with high IEI values are assumed to be more stable and resilient. While this makes sense from a theoretical point of view, there is lack of evidence on the contribution of indirect interactions to ecosystem stability and resilience. Investigation of this relationship between resilience and indirect effects leads to a better understanding of IEI, that it is actually a sum of three distinct components (IEI-cycle, IEI-mixed and IEI-pure), each of which is identified by their relation to cycling. IEI and FCI are highly correlated because both values increase with average path length path, which is the average number of compartments a unit flow material passes through before exiting the system. While IEI and FCI are highly correlated, the third component of IEI, IEI-pure, is totally uncorrelated with cycling.This is because the effects of cycling are excluded from IEI-pure, by definition. Interestingly, we find out that IEI-pure is the major contributor to ecosystem resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazanci, Caner & Ma, Qianqian & Basheer, Aladeen Al & Azizi, Asma, 2023. "Resilience, indirect effects and cycling in ecological networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:481:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023000741
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023000741
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Q. & Kazanci, C., 2013. "Analysis of indirect effects within ecosystem models using pathway-based methodology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 238-245.
    2. Min, Yong & Jin, Xiaogang & Chang, Jie & Peng, Changhui & Gu, Baojing & Ge, Ying & Zhong, Yang, 2011. "Weak indirect effects inherent to nitrogen biogeochemical cycling within anthropogenic ecosystems: A network environ analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3277-3284.
    3. Kazancı, Caner, 2007. "EcoNet: A new software for ecological modeling, simulation and network analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 3-8.
    4. Miehls, Andrea L. Jaeger & Mason, Doran M. & Frank, Kenneth A. & Krause, Ann E. & Peacor, Scott D. & Taylor, William W., 2009. "Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3182-3193.
    5. Miehls, Andrea L. Jaeger & Mason, Doran M. & Frank, Kenneth A. & Krause, Ann E. & Peacor, Scott D. & Taylor, William W., 2009. "Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of Oneida Lake, New York, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3194-3209.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    2. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A. & Salas, A.K., 2011. "Equivalence of the realized input and output oriented indirect effects metrics in Ecological Network Analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(13), pages 2142-2148.
    3. Canning, A.D. & Death, R.G., 2017. "Trophic cascade direction and flow determine network flow stability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 355(C), pages 18-23.
    4. Salas, Andria K. & Borrett, Stuart R., 2011. "Evidence for the dominance of indirect effects in 50 trophic ecosystem networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1192-1204.
    5. Colvin, Michael E. & Pierce, Clay L. & Stewart, Timothy W., 2015. "A food web modeling analysis of a Midwestern, USA eutrophic lake dominated by non-native Common Carp and Zebra Mussels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 26-40.
    6. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A., 2011. "Reconnecting environs to their environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2393-2403.
    7. Schaubroeck, Thomas & Staelens, Jeroen & Verheyen, Kris & Muys, Bart & Dewulf, Jo, 2012. "Improved ecological network analysis for environmental sustainability assessment; a case study on a forest ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 144-156.
    8. Borrett, S.R. & Salas, A.K., 2010. "Evidence for resource homogenization in 50 trophic ecosystem networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(13), pages 1710-1716.
    9. Buzhdygan, Oksana Y. & Rudenko, Svitlana S. & Kazanci, Caner & Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "Effect of invasive black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) on nitrogen cycle in floodplain ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 170-177.
    10. Miehls, Andrea L. Jaeger & Mason, Doran M. & Frank, Kenneth A. & Krause, Ann E. & Peacor, Scott D. & Taylor, William W., 2009. "Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3182-3193.
    11. Fath, Brian D. & Scharler, Ursula M. & Baird, Dan, 2013. "Dependence of network metrics on model aggregation and throughflow calculations: Demonstration using the Sylt–Rømø Bight Ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 214-219.
    12. Tollner, E.W. & Schramski, J.R. & Kazanci, C. & Patten, B.C., 2009. "Implications of network particle tracking (NPT) for ecological model interpretation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(16), pages 1904-1912.
    13. Coskun, Huseyin, 2018. "Dynamic Ecological System Analysis," OSF Preprints 35xkb, Center for Open Science.
    14. Wu, Dongdong & Zhang, Yan & Zhang, Xiaolin & Fath, Brain D., 2023. "Research progress of urban nitrogen cycle and metabolism," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    15. Coskun, Huseyin, 2018. "Dynamic Ecological System Measures," OSF Preprints j2pd3, Center for Open Science.
    16. repec:osf:osfxxx:j2pd3_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Coskun, Huseyin, 2018. "Static Ecological System Analysis," OSF Preprints zqxc5, Center for Open Science.
    18. J. Garcia-Algarra & J. M. Pastor & M. L. Mouronte & J. Galeano, 2018. "A Structural Approach to Disentangle the Visualization of Bipartite Biological Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, February.
    19. repec:osf:osfxxx:35xkb_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Zhang, Yan & Lu, Hanjing & Fath, Brian D. & Zheng, Hongmei, 2016. "Modelling urban nitrogen metabolic processes based on ecological network analysis: A case of study in Beijing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 29-38.
    21. Zavalishin, Nikolay N., 2008. "Dynamic compartment approach for modelling regimes of carbon cycle functioning in bog ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 16-32.
    22. Kazanci, C. & Ma, Q., 2012. "Extending ecological network analysis measures to dynamic ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 180-188.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:481:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023000741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.