IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v295y2015icp47-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Link tracking: Quantifying network flows from qualitative node–link digraphs

Author

Listed:
  • Patten, Bernard C.

Abstract

This paper gives a possible explanation for how changes in holistic network organization can come to be reflected in changes in mechanistic processes thought to be under local control by organisms and abiota. Most point-contact, or node(●)-link (—,→), networks in science are qualitative. Their complexity is great and quantification is difficult. Networks depict wholeness and are models for holism. Mathematically, they are graphs, unweighted when unquantified, and either undirected (●–●; most social networks) or directed (●→●; most ecological food webs). Directed graphs are digraphs. The question of this paper is, can unweighted digraphs be used to quantify mass–energy link flows? A methodology, link tracking, is developed to achieve this. Simple paths (no repeated nodes) and cycles in the network are identified. Links for different node pairs are tallied along these pathways, and used to calculate transition probabilities. These are extended to all pathways (direct+indirect) by matrix inversion; the resultant coefficients are used in conjunction with boundary inputs to generate flows. Applied to an ecological stock-and-flow model, empirical measurements lay within ±2 times the corresponding link tracking values. This reinforces the intuition that digraph structure and flow function are intimately related, which is the principal general finding of the paper. However, only one “structure-based” parameterization is calculable per digraph by link tracking, whereas many “functional” empirical flows are possible. The meaning of the link tracking values is therefore to be resolved. In discussion, it is hypothesized that link tracking structural flows are basins of attraction – centrally tending mean flows around which realizable empirical flows are constrained by structure to be distributed. The methodology sheds light on previously unexplained results from an early radiotracer study of experimental ecological networks. Uses of link tracking to expand existing knowledge of food webs and other kinds of qualitative networks are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Patten, Bernard C., 2015. "Link tracking: Quantifying network flows from qualitative node–link digraphs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 47-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:295:y:2015:i:c:p:47-58
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.09.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014004311
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.09.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patten, Bernard C. & Straškraba, Milan & Jørgensen, Sven E., 2011. "Ecosystems emerging. 5: Constraints," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(16), pages 2945-2972.
    2. Buzhdygan, Oksana Y. & Patten, Bernard C. & Kazanci, Caner & Ma, Qianqian & Rudenko, Svitlana S., 2012. "Dynamical and system-wide properties of linear flow-quantified food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 176-184.
    3. Matamba, L. & Kazanci, C. & Schramski, J.R. & Blessing, M. & Alexander, P. & Patten, B.C., 2009. "Throughflow analysis: A stochastic approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3174-3181.
    4. Kazancı, Caner, 2007. "EcoNet: A new software for ecological modeling, simulation and network analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 3-8.
    5. Whipple, Stuart J. & Patten, Bernard C. & Borrett, Stuart R., 2014. "Indirect effects and distributed control in ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 161-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "The cardinal hypotheses of Holoecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 63-111.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    2. Buzhdygan, Oksana Y. & Rudenko, Svitlana S. & Kazanci, Caner & Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "Effect of invasive black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) on nitrogen cycle in floodplain ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 170-177.
    3. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A. & Salas, A.K., 2011. "Equivalence of the realized input and output oriented indirect effects metrics in Ecological Network Analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(13), pages 2142-2148.
    4. Ma, Q. & Kazanci, C., 2013. "Analysis of indirect effects within ecosystem models using pathway-based methodology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 238-245.
    5. Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "The cardinal hypotheses of Holoecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 63-111.
    6. Kazanci, C. & Ma, Q., 2012. "Extending ecological network analysis measures to dynamic ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 180-188.
    7. Patten, Bernard C. & Straškraba, Milan & Jørgensen, Sven E., 2011. "Ecosystems emerging. 5: Constraints," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(16), pages 2945-2972.
    8. Tollner, E.W. & Kazanci, C. & Schramski, J.R. & Patten, B.C., 2009. "Control system approaches to ecological systems analysis: Invariants and frequency response," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3233-3240.
    9. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Assessing the cumulative environmental impact of hydropower construction on river systems based on energy network model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 78-92.
    10. Patten, Bernard C., 2014. "Systems ecology and environmentalism: Getting the science right. Part I: Facets for a more holistic Nature Book of ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 4-21.
    11. Fath, Brian D. & Scharler, Ursula M. & Baird, Dan, 2013. "Dependence of network metrics on model aggregation and throughflow calculations: Demonstration using the Sylt–Rømø Bight Ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 214-219.
    12. Tollner, E.W. & Schramski, J.R. & Kazanci, C. & Patten, B.C., 2009. "Implications of network particle tracking (NPT) for ecological model interpretation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(16), pages 1904-1912.
    13. Buzhdygan, O.Y. & Rudenko, S.S. & Patten, B.C. & Kostyshyn, S.S., 2014. "Food-web topology of Ukrainian mountain grasslands: Comparative properties and relations to ecosystem parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 128-138.
    14. Schramski, J.R. & Patten, B.C. & Kazanci, C. & Gattie, D.K. & Kellam, N.N., 2009. "The Reynolds transport theorem: Application to ecological compartment modeling and case study of ecosystem energetics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3225-3232.
    15. Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "Systems ecology and environmentalism: Getting the science right. Part II: The Janus Enigma Hypothesis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 335(C), pages 101-138.
    16. Xu, Wanying & Zhou, Chuanbin & Cao, Aixin & Luo, Min, 2016. "Understanding the mechanism of food waste management by using stakeholder analysis and social network model: An industrial ecology perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 63-72.
    17. Coskun, Huseyin, 2018. "Static Ecological System Measures," OSF Preprints g4xzt, Center for Open Science.
    18. Buzhdygan, Oksana Y. & Patten, Bernard C. & Kazanci, Caner & Ma, Qianqian & Rudenko, Svitlana S., 2012. "Dynamical and system-wide properties of linear flow-quantified food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 176-184.
    19. Borrett, Stuart R. & Moody, James & Edelmann, Achim, 2014. "The rise of Network Ecology: Maps of the topic diversity and scientific collaboration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 111-127.
    20. Lu, Jingzhao & Lu, Hongwei & Wang, Weipeng & Feng, SanSan & Lei, Kaiwen, 2021. "Ecological risk assessment of heavy metal contamination of mining area soil based on land type changes: An information network environ analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:295:y:2015:i:c:p:47-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.