IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v410y2019ic7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RITY – A phenology model of Ips typographus as a tool for optimization of its monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Ogris, Nikica
  • Ferlan, Mitja
  • Hauptman, Tine
  • Pavlin, Roman
  • Kavčič, Andreja
  • Jurc, Maja
  • de Groot, Maarten

Abstract

We developed the RITY-2 phenology model for the spatial and temporal simulation of the seasonal development of Ips typographus based on the PHENIPS model and the data of Integrated Nowcasting through Comprehensive Analysis (INCA). Many parts of PHENIPS were improved with innovative approaches and a new model was developed. European spruce bark beetle phenology was monitored at eight study sites in 2017 and 2018, along with air and bark temperature measurements. RITY-2 predictions are based on air temperature from the INCA system, which is used to calculate the effective bark temperature for beetle development. An innovative procedure was introduced which finds most appropriate spring threshold from which calculation of the phenological model initiates. The onset of Norway spruce infestation in spring was estimated using a lower threshold of 14.5 °C for flight activity and a mean thermal sum of 53.0 degree-days (dd) from 7th March onward. The rate of brood development was calculated from the cumulative effective thermal sum of 30-min temperature data using upper and lower temperature thresholds of 38.9 and 8.3 °C, respectively, and a nonlinear function. For validation, we compared the timing of phenological events in the field with predicted events using both 30-minute recorded data from trap logs in the field and hourly data from INCA. The onset of spring swarming was estimated with a mean absolute error of 2.4 days. The onset of infestation was predicted with a mean absolute error of 4.7 days. The observed onset of emergence of filial beetles was estimated with a mean error of 0.5 dd. The model is calculated according to three scenarios that simulate different stand conditions. RITY-2 explicitly considers the strong effects of regional topography and can be used for precise monitoring of the actual state of bark beetle development at the specific model cell with a spatial resolution of 1 km × 1 km. Additionally, RITY-2 simulates the number of generations, which is necessary to assess the potential impact of bark beetle outbreaks at the regional scale. The model was successfully incorporated into two web applications that serve as tools for the timely deployment of pheromone traps and trap trees for European spruce bark beetle monitoring. The possible application of the RITY-2 model for the whole of Central Europe using data from the INCA system is discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ogris, Nikica & Ferlan, Mitja & Hauptman, Tine & Pavlin, Roman & Kavčič, Andreja & Jurc, Maja & de Groot, Maarten, 2019. "RITY – A phenology model of Ips typographus as a tool for optimization of its monitoring," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 410(C), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:410:y:2019:i:c:7
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380019302832
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seidl, Rupert & Baier, Peter & Rammer, Werner & Schopf, Axel & Lexer, Manfred J., 2007. "Modelling tree mortality by bark beetle infestation in Norway spruce forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 383-399.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ogris, Nikica & Ferlan, Mitja & Hauptman, Tine & Pavlin, Roman & Kavčič, Andreja & Jurc, Maja & de Groot, Maarten, 2020. "Sensitivity analysis, calibration and validation of a phenology model for Pityogenes chalcographus (CHAPY)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seidl, Rupert & Fernandes, Paulo M. & Fonseca, Teresa F. & Gillet, François & Jönsson, Anna Maria & Merganičová, Katarína & Netherer, Sigrid & Arpaci, Alexander & Bontemps, Jean-Daniel & Bugmann, Hara, 2011. "Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 903-924.
    2. Fahse, Lorenz & Heurich, Marco, 2011. "Simulation and analysis of outbreaks of bark beetle infestations and their management at the stand level," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1833-1846.
    3. Honkaniemi, Juha & Ojansuu, Risto & Kasanen, Risto & Heliövaara, Kari, 2018. "Interaction of disturbance agents on Norway spruce: A mechanistic model of bark beetle dynamics integrated in simulation framework WINDROT," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 388(C), pages 45-60.
    4. Christoph Huber & Maximilian Kastner & Eduard Hochbichler & Karl Stampfer, 2017. "Effect of Topping Trees on Biomass and Nitrogen Removal in the Thinning of Norway Spruce Stands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Thiele, Jan C. & Nuske, Robert S. & Ahrends, Bernd & Panferov, Oleg & Albert, Matthias & Staupendahl, Kai & Junghans, Udo & Jansen, Martin & Saborowski, Joachim, 2017. "Climate change impact assessment—A simulation experiment with Norway spruce for a forest district in Central Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 30-47.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:410:y:2019:i:c:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.