IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v359y2017icp128-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Giant panda survival crisis remains serious based on the ecosystem catastrophe model

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Zhigang
  • Li, Junqing

Abstract

The habitat area of the giant panda and the number of wild populations have increased significantly over the past decade, while habitat fragmentation and survival crisis of local populations have become more serious. To assess the current survival status of the giant panda, we analyzed the Third and Fourth National Panda Survey data using trend line analysis, moving T-test, and catastrophe theory. The catastrophe potential function and the cusp catastrophe model were constructed to analyze the ecosystem stability. The results showed that over the past decade, each single index, such as habitat area or population size, increased, and the discreteness of local population size and habitat patch area improved. However, no substantial improvement was identified in discreteness, whereas ecosystem stability was weakened by severe habitat fragmentation and population isolation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Zhigang & Li, Junqing, 2017. "Giant panda survival crisis remains serious based on the ecosystem catastrophe model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 128-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:359:y:2017:i:c:p:128-134
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.05.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380017300145
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.05.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Kharrazi & Brian D. Fath & Harald Katzmair, 2016. "Advancing Empirical Approaches to the Concept of Resilience: A Critical Examination of Panarchy, Ecological Information, and Statistical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan, Zhigang & Dayananda, Buddhi & Qin, Wei & Gao, Jie & Wang, Xueli & Popovic, Igor, 2023. "System evolution model of human disturbances in panda habitats," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    2. Zhang, Jingjing & Pimm, Stuart L. & Xu, Weihua & Shi, Xuewei & Xiao, Yang & Kong, Lingqiao & Fan, Xinyue & Ouyang, Zhiyun, 2020. "Relationship between giant panda populations and selected ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Armano Srbljinoviæ & Jasmina Božiæ & Brian D. Fath, 2020. "Croatian crisis management system's response to COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of a systemic resilience model," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 18(4), pages 408-424.
    3. Tzen-Ying Ling, 2022. "Dynamic Flood Resilience Typology: A Systemic Transitional Adaptation from Peitou Plateau, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Auad, Guillermo & Blythe, Jonathan & Coffman, Kim & Fath, Brian D., 2018. "A dynamic management framework for socio-ecological system stewardship: A case study for the United States Bureau of Ocean Energy Management," MarXiv nurca, Center for Open Science.
    5. Ali Kharrazi & Shogo Kudo & Doreen Allasiw, 2018. "Addressing Misconceptions to the Concept of Resilience in Environmental Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Yi Liu & Peng Li & Zhiwei Zhang, 2018. "Resilient or Not: A Comparative Case Study of Ten Local Water Markets in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Patricia Abduragimova & Brian D. Fath & Christian Gulas & Harald Katzmair, 2023. "Participatory approach for assessing institutional resilience: a case study of crises in Austria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9201-9225, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:359:y:2017:i:c:p:128-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.