IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v279y2014icp89-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the dynamics of eastern U.S. forests: Implications for developing broad-scale forest dynamics models

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Tao
  • Lichstein, Jeremy W.
  • Birdsey, Richard A.

Abstract

Spatial and temporal environmental heterogeneity is known to play an important role in the dynamics of populations and communities. However, the implications of this heterogeneity for developing and testing regional- to global-scale forest dynamics models are largely unexplored. Predictions from forest dynamics models are typically compared to chronosequences assembled from forest inventory data using the space-for-time substitution approach, which assumes that different-aged stands across space have followed (and will follow) the same dynamics. Often, this assumption is invalid in the presence of spatial and/or temporal heterogeneity. We used the perfect plasticity approximation (PPA) forest dynamics model, parameterized with forest inventory data for >10 forest types in the eastern U.S., to diagnose spatial and temporal heterogeneity in forest dynamics, and to explore how this heterogeneity can affect comparisons between predicted dynamics and chronosequence observations. Our results provided evidence that spatial and temporal heterogeneity are widespread in eastern U.S. forests. Temporal heterogeneity was apparent because species whose observed abundances have increased over recent decades tended to be the same species for which predicted abundance (derived from individual-level growth and mortality rates estimated from the recent decades of inventory data) were greater than observed abundance. Spatial heterogeneity was apparent because species had more competitive parameter estimates (higher growth and/or lower mortality) on inventory plots where they are most abundant, relative to other plots in the same forest type. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity both contributed to mismatches between predicted dynamics and chronosequence observations. Predictions of canopy structure (proportion of individuals in the upper canopy vs. the understory) were well-matched to inventory data, suggesting that the PPA's simple space-filling algorithm was not an important source of error in predicting forest dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Tao & Lichstein, Jeremy W. & Birdsey, Richard A., 2014. "Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the dynamics of eastern U.S. forests: Implications for developing broad-scale forest dynamics models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 279(C), pages 89-99.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:279:y:2014:i:c:p:89-99
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.02.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014000969
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.02.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sato, Hisashi & Itoh, Akihiko & Kohyama, Takashi, 2007. "SEIB–DGVM: A new Dynamic Global Vegetation Model using a spatially explicit individual-based approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 279-307.
    2. Larocque, Guy R. & Archambault, Louis & Delisle, Claude, 2011. "Development of the gap model ZELIG-CFS to predict the dynamics of North American mixed forest types with complex structures," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2570-2583.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bohn, Friedrich J. & Frank, Karin & Huth, Andreas, 2014. "Of climate and its resulting tree growth: Simulating the productivity of temperate forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 278(C), pages 9-17.
    2. Brazhnik, Ksenia & Shugart, H.H., 2016. "SIBBORK: A new spatially-explicit gap model for boreal forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 182-196.
    3. Millington, James D.A. & Walters, Michael B. & Matonis, Megan S. & Liu, Jianguo, 2013. "Filling the gap: A compositional gap regeneration model for managed northern hardwood forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 17-27.
    4. Taubert, Franziska & Frank, Karin & Huth, Andreas, 2012. "A review of grassland models in the biofuel context," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 84-93.
    5. Rau, E-Ping & Fischer, Fabian & Joetzjer, Émilie & Maréchaux, Isabelle & Sun, I Fang & Chave, Jérôme, 2022. "Transferability of an individual- and trait-based forest dynamics model: A test case across the tropics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    6. Bellassen, V. & le Maire, G. & Guin, O. & Dhôte, J.F. & Ciais, P. & Viovy, N., 2011. "Modelling forest management within a global vegetation model—Part 2: Model validation from a tree to a continental scale," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 57-75.
    7. Vance, Richard R. & Steele, Mark A. & Forrester, Graham E., 2010. "Using an individual-based model to quantify scale transition in demographic rate functions: Deaths in a coral reef fish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1907-1921.
    8. Millington, James D.A. & Walters, Michael B. & Matonis, Megan S. & Liu, Jianguo, 2013. "Modelling for forest management synergies and trade-offs: Northern hardwood tree regeneration, timber and deer," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 103-112.
    9. Larocque, Guy R. & Bhatti, Jagtar & Arsenault, André, 2014. "Integrated modelling software platform development for effective use of ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 195-202.
    10. Kruse, Stefan & Wieczorek, Mareike & Jeltsch, Florian & Herzschuh, Ulrike, 2016. "Treeline dynamics in Siberia under changing climates as inferred from an individual-based model for Larix," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 338(C), pages 101-121.
    11. Bellassen, V. & Le Maire, G. & Dhôte, J.F. & Ciais, P. & Viovy, N., 2010. "Modelling forest management within a global vegetation model—Part 1: Model structure and general behaviour," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(20), pages 2458-2474.
    12. Wramneby, Anna & Smith, Benjamin & Zaehle, Sönke & Sykes, Martin T., 2008. "Parameter uncertainties in the modelling of vegetation dynamics—Effects on tree community structure and ecosystem functioning in European forest biomes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 277-290.
    13. Nakagawa, Yoshiaki & Yokozawa, Masayuki & Ito, Akihiko & Hara, Toshihiko, 2017. "Effectively tuning plant growth models with different spatial complexity: A statistical perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 95-112.
    14. Manusch, Corina & Bugmann, Harald & Wolf, Annett, 2014. "Sensitivity of simulated productivity to soil characteristics and plant water uptake along drought gradients in the Swiss Alps," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 282(C), pages 25-34.
    15. Fischer, Rico & Bohn, Friedrich & Dantas de Paula, Mateus & Dislich, Claudia & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Gutiérrez, Alvaro G. & Kazmierczak, Martin & Knapp, Nikolai & Lehmann, Sebastian & Paulick, Sebastia, 2016. "Lessons learned from applying a forest gap model to understand ecosystem and carbon dynamics of complex tropical forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 124-133.
    16. Badouard, Vincyane & Schmitt, Sylvain & Salzet, Guillaume & Gaquiere, Thomas & Rojat, Margaux & Bedeau, Caroline & Brunaux, Olivier & Derroire, Géraldine, 2024. "LoggingLab: An R package to simulate reduced-impact selective logging in tropical forests using forest inventory data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 487(C).
    17. Holm, Jennifer A. & Shugart, H.H. & Van Bloem, S.J. & Larocque, G.R., 2012. "Gap model development, validation, and application to succession of secondary subtropical dry forests of Puerto Rico," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 233(C), pages 70-82.
    18. Wirth, Stephen Björn & Taubert, Franziska & Tietjen, Britta & Müller, Christoph & Rolinski, Susanne, 2021. "Do details matter? Disentangling the processes related to plant species interactions in two grassland models of different complexity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 460(C).
    19. Brazhnik, Ksenia & Shugart, H.H., 2017. "Model sensitivity to spatial resolution and explicit light representation for simulation of boreal forests in complex terrain," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 352(C), pages 90-107.
    20. Seidl, Rupert & Rammer, Werner & Scheller, Robert M. & Spies, Thomas A., 2012. "An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 87-100.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:279:y:2014:i:c:p:89-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.