IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v251y2013icp85-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergy evaluation of DNA and culture in ‘information cycles’

Author

Listed:
  • Abel, Thomas

Abstract

Explication of the ‘information cycle’ and its energy basis is a crowning component of H.T. Odum's theorizing of general systems. This paper applies the information cycle to cultural information. Specifically, the information cycle concept is applied to one domain of information production, regular conversation. The transformities of conversation production are estimated by adopting principles from Odum's rainforest examples where he estimated transformities of information flows of various kinds, specifically, the emergy to copy units containing information, emergy to isolate and extract information, emergy to sustain an information cycle, and emergy to develop new information. The second and third kinds have been evaluated for conversation. Transformities of conversation follow a similar pattern of increasing values (2.21E15 and 1.50E16sej/J, respectively). These results are compared with two other studies of cultural information production, one for television media and one for education. Taken together, these results suggest that cultural information is in fact a nested hierarchy of cultural information scales, with transformities that increase in order, with conversation first, then media, and finally education. This paper indicates how conversation can be illuminated as an information cycle, and located in a hierarchy of information production.

Suggested Citation

  • Abel, Thomas, 2013. "Emergy evaluation of DNA and culture in ‘information cycles’," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 85-98.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:251:y:2013:i:c:p:85-98
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.11.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012005650
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.11.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abel, Thomas, 2010. "Human transformities in a global hierarchy: Emergy and scale in the production of people and culture," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(17), pages 2112-2117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Qing & Liu, Gengyuan & Giannetti, Biagio F. & Agostinho, Feni & M.V.B. Almeida, Cecília & Casazza, Marco, 2020. "Emergy-based ecosystem services valuation and classification management applied to China’s grasslands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    2. Silvia H. Bonilla & Helton R. O. Silva & Marcia Terra da Silva & Rodrigo Franco Gonçalves & José B. Sacomano, 2018. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Abel, Thomas, 2015. "Convergence and divergence in the production of energy transformation hierarchies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 4-11.
    4. Rafael Araujo Nacimento & Mario Duarte Canever & Cecilia Almeida & Feni Agostinho & Augusto Hauber Gameiro & Biagio Fernando Giannetti, 2023. "Hidden Costs Associated with Smallholder Family-Based Broiler Production: Accounting for the Intangibles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Giannetti, Biagio F. & Marcilio, Maria De Fatima D.F.B. & Coscieme, Luca & Agostinho, Feni & Liu, Gengyuan & Almeida, Cecilia M.V.B., 2019. "Howard Odum’s “Self-organization, transformity and information”: Three decades of empirical evidence," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 1-1.
    6. He Zhang & Ashish T. Asutosh & Junxue Zhang, 2022. "A quantitative sustainable comparative study of two biogas systems based on energy, emergy and entropy methods in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13583-13609, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Kamp & Hanne Østergård, 2016. "A Systematic Approach to Explorative Scenario Analysis in Emergy Assessment with Emphasis on Resilience," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Jing An & Aitian Tao & He Yang & Ang Tian, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of the Rare-Earth-Oxide Production Process and Comparison of Environmental Performance Improvements Based on Emergy Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Amaral, Luís P. & Martins, Nélson & Gouveia, Joaquim B., 2016. "A review of emergy theory, its application and latest developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 882-888.
    4. Falkowski, Tomasz B. & Martinez-Bautista, Isaias & Diemont, Stewart A.W., 2015. "How valuable could traditional ecological knowledge education be for a resource-limited future?: An emergy evaluation in two Mexican villages," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 300(C), pages 40-49.
    5. Tian, Xu & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Expanding green supply chain performance measurement through emergy accounting and analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Lupinacci, Daniel M. & Bonilla, Silvia H., 2018. "Exploring approaches and dimensions of human transformity through an educational case," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 336-343.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:251:y:2013:i:c:p:85-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.