IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v45y2003i2p203-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries

Author

Listed:
  • Neumayer, Eric

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Neumayer, Eric, 2003. "Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 203-220, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:45:y:2003:i:2:p:203-220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921-8009(03)00012-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hukkinen, Janne, 1995. "Corporatism as an impediment to ecological sustenance: the case of Finnish waste management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 59-75, October.
    2. Scruggs, Lyle, 2001. "Is There Really a Link Between Neo-Corporatism and Environmental Performance? Updated Evidence and New Data for the 1980s and 1990s," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(04), pages 686-692, October.
    3. R F King & A Borchardt, 1994. "Red and green: air pollution levels and left party power in OECD countries," Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 12(2), pages 225-241, April.
    4. Scruggs, Lyle A., 1999. "Institutions and Environmental Performance in Seventeen Western Democracies," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(01), pages 1-31, January.
    5. Lijphart, Arend & Crepaz, Markus M. L., 1991. "Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(02), pages 235-246, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:45:y:2003:i:2:p:203-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.