IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v90y2026icp308-321.html

The paradox of occupational prestige and the indignity of labor: Understanding voluntary unemployment

Author

Listed:
  • Marjit, Baisakhi
  • Marjit, Sugata
  • Gupta, Kausik
  • Kar, Saibal

Abstract

Occupational prestige or job status may lead individuals to remain unemployed even when jobs are available. In societies where employment is closely tied with accumulated family wealth, it can increase the opportunity cost of accepting lower-status jobs. In developing countries, the problem of labor shortage is due to ‘indignity of labor’ for some specific jobs. This paper argues that what is typically classified as involuntary unemployment, may in fact, contain a voluntary component. The paper shows that with uniform distribution of demand across occupations, voluntary unemployment is likely to emerge for jobs with very low occupational prestige. However, for jobs with very high prestige excess demand is likely to emerge due to shortage of high skills. We show that an increased supply of labor will not clear the market when social concerns over job status and dependence on family wealth persist.

Suggested Citation

  • Marjit, Baisakhi & Marjit, Sugata & Gupta, Kausik & Kar, Saibal, 2026. "The paradox of occupational prestige and the indignity of labor: Understanding voluntary unemployment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 308-321.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:308-321
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625004928
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:308-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.