IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v78y2017icp32-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“We are merchandise on a conveyer belt”: How young adults in the public child protection system perceive their participation in decisions about their care

Author

Listed:
  • Križ, Katrin
  • Roundtree-Swain, Dakota

Abstract

The aim of this study is to show young people's feelings about their experiences with participation in decision-making in public care. The study is based on semi-structured, in-depth interviews with eight young adults in the public child protection system in a northeastern state in the U.S. conducted between 2015 and 2016. All study participants had made both positive and negative experiences with participation. Most reported negative experiences at the point of their first entry into care, and most reported positive experiences when signing themselves back into the care of the child protection system when they turned 18. Further, we found barriers and pathways to participation at the individual child's or youth's level, including a child's or youth's ability to self-advocate, access to information, and age. Organizational-level factors that affected a child or young person's participation included the child protection agency's view of the child or youth; the agency's view of the parents; the quality of legal representation, and the type of rapport between social workers and children or young people in care. We discuss the implications of these findings on theory and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Križ, Katrin & Roundtree-Swain, Dakota, 2017. "“We are merchandise on a conveyer belt”: How young adults in the public child protection system perceive their participation in decisions about their care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 32-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:78:y:2017:i:c:p:32-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740917301895
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vis, Svein Arild & Fossum, Sturla, 2013. "Representation of children's views in court hearings about custody and parental visitations — A comparison between what children wanted and what the courts ruled," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2101-2109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lätsch, David & Quehenberger, Julia & Portmann, Rahel & Jud, Andreas, 2023. "Children’s participation in the child protection system: Are young people from poor families less likely to be heard?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Paulo Delgado & João M. S. Carvalho & Sílvia Alves, 2023. "Children and Young People’s Participation in decision-making in Foster Care," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(1), pages 421-445, February.
    3. Ehlke, Carolin & Schröer, Wolfgang, 2023. "Fluid transitions – “weak” constellations of participation in the process of leaving care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Gabriel, Thomas, 2023. "The child – Object or subject of child care?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Uggerhøj, Lars & Abdullah, Alhassan, 2020. "“We are consultants, not collaborators”: Young people’s experiences with child protection meetings in Ghana," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Gazit, Matan & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2020. "Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Berit Skauge & Anita Skårstad Storhaug & Edgar Marthinsen, 2021. "The What, Why and How of Child Participation—A Review of the Conceptualization of “Child Participation” in Child Welfare," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Pridmore, William & Levy, Michael H. & McArthur, Morag, 2017. "Slipping through the cracks: Examining the realities of a child-friendly prison system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 226-231.
    9. Floor Middel & Wendy Post & Mónica López López & Hans Grietens, 2021. "Participation of Children Involved in the Child Protection System – Validation of the Meaningful Participation Assessment Tool (MPAT)," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(2), pages 713-735, April.
    10. Miller, J. Jay & Duron, Jacquelynn F. & Donohue-Dioh, Jessica & Geiger, Jennifer M., 2018. "Conceptualizing effective legal representation for Foster youth: A group concept mapping study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 271-278.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerdts-Andresen, Tina, 2021. "A scoping review of when and how a child’s view is weighted in decision-making processes in law proceedings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Judith Cashmore & Peiling Kong & Meredith McLaine, 2023. "Children’s Participation in Care and Protection Decision-Making Matters," Laws, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Gerdts-Andresen, Tina & Aarum Hansen, Heidi, 2021. "How the child’s views is weighted in care order proceedings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:78:y:2017:i:c:p:32-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.