IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v33y2011i3p457-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interviewing parents of children in care: Perspectives, discourses and accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Hall, Christopher
  • Slembrouck, Stef

Abstract

The 'parental perspective' in child care work is a matter of concern and is actively solicited by practitioners, managers, policymakers and researchers for differing reasons. This paper argues that the search for such a stable "parental perspective" should be abandoned and suggest that research should embrace a social constructionist turn by concentrating on how parents' views are negotiated conversationally in discourse. Using data drawn from research interviews with parents of children in care and employing conversation and discourse analytic methods, the paper demonstrates how there are critical issues of accountability, blame, and testing at stake in the interview encounter, as interviewer and interviewee jointly produce a moral version of the client, the institution, the case and its attributes. The implications of this argument are delineated.

Suggested Citation

  • Hall, Christopher & Slembrouck, Stef, 2011. "Interviewing parents of children in care: Perspectives, discourses and accountability," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 457-465, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:33:y:2011:i:3:p:457-465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(10)00185-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baker, Amy J.L., 2007. "Client feedback in child welfare programs: Current trends and future directions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1189-1200, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davies, Kate & Ross, Nicola & Cocks, Jessica & Foote, Wendy, 2023. "Family inclusion in child protection: Knowledge, power and resistance," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Pelton, Leroy H., 2011. "Concluding commentary: Varied perspectives on child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 481-485, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuuli-Brit Vaga & Dagmar Kutsar, 2022. "Client Agency in Child Protection Work in Estonia: Clients’ Perspectives," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(5), pages 1793-1820, October.
    2. Schneiderman, Janet U. & Smith, Caitlin & Palinkas, Lawrence A., 2012. "The caregiver as gatekeeper for accessing health care for children in foster care: A qualitative study of kinship and unrelated caregivers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2123-2130.
    3. Stepleton, Kate & Bosk, Emily Adlin & Duron, Jacquelynn F. & Greenfield, Brett & Ocasio, Kerrie & MacKenzie, Michael J., 2018. "Exploring associations between maternal adverse childhood experiences and child behavior," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 80-87.
    4. Estefan, Lianne Fuino & Coulter, Martha L. & VandeWeerd, Carla L. & Armstrong, Mary & Gorski, Peter, 2012. "Receiving mandated therapeutic services: Experiences of parents involved in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2353-2360.
    5. Ayala-Nunes, Lara & Jiménez, Lucía & Hidalgo, Victoria & Jesus, Saul, 2014. "Family feedback in Child Welfare Services: A systematic review of measures," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 299-306.
    6. Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Uggerhøj, Lars & Abdullah, Alhassan, 2020. "“We are consultants, not collaborators”: Young people’s experiences with child protection meetings in Ghana," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Mundy, Crystal L. & Neufeld, Amanda N. & Wells, Susan J., 2016. "A culturally relevant measure of client satisfaction in child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 177-189.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:33:y:2011:i:3:p:457-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.