IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v156y2024ics0190740923005236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of the ZERO TO THREE Infant-Toddler Court Teams on type and time of exits from out-of-home care: A new study ten years after the first competing risks analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Casanueva, Cecilia
  • Williams, Jason
  • Kluckman, Marianne
  • Harris, Sarah
  • Goldman Fraser, Jenifer

Abstract

Infant-Toddler Court Teams (ITCTs) are a collaborative practice that improves, aligns, and integrates systems and builds community capacity to advance the health and well-being of very young children under court jurisdiction who are in foster care or at risk of removal from their homes, and their families. A permanent—forever—home that provides a safe, stable, and nurturing environment is crucial for supporting healthy development in the first three years of life. Through proactive collaborative problem-solving at the family and systems level, ITCTs expedite referrals for both children and their parents to comprehensive services and supports that prevent removal and that promote reunification and other lasting permanency outcomes. This retrospective, quasi-experimental study examines permanency outcomes for children who were served by an ITCT for at least one year between 2010 and 2018. The goal of the study was to examine differences in type and time to permanency between ITCT children in out-of-home care and a comparison group created using propensity score matching from a sample of children in the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW II). Overall, reunification was the most common type of permanency for ITCT children and was significantly higher among ITCT children compared to the NSCAW II sample (43.7% vs. 25.6%, p <.001). In addition, ITCT children were significantly less likely to remain in foster care by the end of the study period (2.7% vs. 16.9%, p <.001). ITCT children also had a shorter mean time to permanency at 450.6 days compared to 654.9 days for those in the NSCAW II group. In both unadjusted and adjusted survival models, the main effect of ITCT was significant, with children in the ITCT group being 1.6 times as likely to exit foster care to permanency compared to NSCAW II group. These findings replicate those of a previous study published ten years ago. The focus of ITCTs on proactively frontloading services for both parents and children, including integrated trauma and substance use disorder treatment and health and mental health services, is a crucial pathway toward safe and nurturing permanency outcomes for families in vulnerable situations that involve young children.

Suggested Citation

  • Casanueva, Cecilia & Williams, Jason & Kluckman, Marianne & Harris, Sarah & Goldman Fraser, Jenifer, 2024. "The effect of the ZERO TO THREE Infant-Toddler Court Teams on type and time of exits from out-of-home care: A new study ten years after the first competing risks analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005236
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923005236
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.