IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v71y2014icp288-297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal sequential designs in phase I studies

Author

Listed:
  • Azriel, David

Abstract

Phase I clinical trials are conducted in order to find the maximum tolerated dose of a given drug out of a set of doses, usually finite. In general, once a formal target function and a suitable probability structure are defined, optimization of sequential studies can theoretically be achieved using backward induction. This is a computationally heavy task and most of the proposed methods can be regarded as “myopic” strategies with respect to a certain loss function. Such designs are computationally feasible, but are not globally optimal. A Dynamic Programming algorithm that overcomes such computational difficulties is presented. It computes the global optimal designs with respect to different loss functions, which represent different purposes of a phase I study. Though the optimal designs provide an improvement over the standard designs, the improvement is not very significant. The expected loss of the global optimal design is about 3% (at most) less than in the “myopic” policies in the specific probability structure that have been considered. This is important as computationally feasible and simple algorithms provide designs that are very close to being optimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Azriel, David, 2014. "Optimal sequential designs in phase I studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 288-297.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:71:y:2014:i:c:p:288-297
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.05.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947313001837
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2013.05.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drovandi, Christopher C. & McGree, James M. & Pettitt, Anthony N., 2013. "Sequential Monte Carlo for Bayesian sequentially designed experiments for discrete data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 320-335.
    2. Ying Kuen Cheung & Rick Chappell, 2002. "A Simple Technique to Evaluate Model Sensitivity in the Continual Reassessment Method," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 671-674, September.
    3. Linda M. Haines & Inna Perevozskaya & William F. Rosenberger, 2003. "Bayesian Optimal Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 591-600, September.
    4. Jay Bartroff & Tze Leung Lai, 2011. "Incorporating Individual and Collective Ethics into Phase I Cancer Trial Designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 596-603, June.
    5. Oron Assaf P. & Azriel David & Hoff Peter D., 2011. "Dose-Finding Designs: The Role of Convergence Properties," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, October.
    6. David Azriel & Micha Mandel & Yosef Rinott, 2010. "The Treatment Versus Experimentation Dilemma in Dose-finding Studies," Discussion Paper Series dp559, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    7. Azriel, David, 2012. "A note on the robustness of the continual reassessment method," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(5), pages 902-906.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azriel, David, 2012. "A note on the robustness of the continual reassessment method," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(5), pages 902-906.
    2. Oron Assaf P. & Azriel David & Hoff Peter D., 2011. "Dose-Finding Designs: The Role of Convergence Properties," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, October.
    3. M. Clertant & J. O’Quigley, 2017. "Semiparametric dose finding methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1487-1508, November.
    4. S. G. J. Senarathne & C. C. Drovandi & J. M. McGree, 2020. "Bayesian sequential design for Copula models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 454-478, June.
    5. Thomas M. Braun, 2018. "Motivating sample sizes in adaptive Phase I trials via Bayesian posterior credible intervals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 1065-1071, September.
    6. Daniel R. Cavagnaro & Richard Gonzalez & Jay I. Myung & Mark A. Pitt, 2013. "Optimal Decision Stimuli for Risky Choice Experiments: An Adaptive Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 358-375, February.
    7. Alessandra Giovagnoli, 2021. "The Bayesian Design of Adaptive Clinical Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Anastasia Ivanova & Se Hee Kim, 2009. "Dose Finding for Continuous and Ordinal Outcomes with a Monotone Objective Function: A Unified Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 307-315, March.
    9. Jacopo Paglia & Jo Eidsvik & Juha Karvanen, 2022. "Efficient spatial designs using Hausdorff distances and Bayesian optimization," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 1060-1084, September.
    10. Sweeting, Michael & Mander, Adrian & Sabin, Tony, 2013. "bcrm: Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method Designs for Phase I Dose-Finding Trials," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 54(i13).
    11. Guosheng Yin & Ying Yuan, 2009. "A Latent Contingency Table Approach to Dose Finding for Combinations of Two Agents," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 866-875, September.
    12. Tianjian Zhou & Wentian Guo & Yuan Ji, 2020. "PoD-TPI: Probability-of-Decision Toxicity Probability Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(2), pages 124-145, July.
    13. Dette, Holger & Biedermann, Stefanie & Zhu, Wei, 2005. "Geometric construction of optimal designs for dose-responsemodels with two parameters," Technical Reports 2005,08, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    14. McGree, J.M., 2017. "Developments of the total entropy utility function for the dual purpose of model discrimination and parameter estimation in Bayesian design," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 207-225.
    15. Nancy Flournoy & José Moler & Fernando Plo, 2020. "Performance Measures in Dose‐Finding Experiments," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 728-751, December.
    16. Jay Bartroff & Tze Leung Lai, 2011. "Incorporating Individual and Collective Ethics into Phase I Cancer Trial Designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 596-603, June.
    17. Dette, Holger & Biedermann, Stefanie & Zhu, Wei, 2004. "Optimal designs for dose-response models with restricted design spaces," Technical Reports 2004,40, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    18. Pavel Mozgunov & Thomas Jaki, 2020. "An information theoretic approach for selecting arms in clinical trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(5), pages 1223-1247, December.
    19. Ryan, Elizabeth G. & Drovandi, Christopher C. & Thompson, M. Helen & Pettitt, Anthony N., 2014. "Towards Bayesian experimental design for nonlinear models that require a large number of sampling times," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 45-60.
    20. Peter F. Thall & Hoang Q. Nguyen & Sarah Zohar & Pierre Maton, 2014. "Optimizing Sedative Dose in Preterm Infants Undergoing Treatment for Respiratory Distress Syndrome," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 931-943, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:71:y:2014:i:c:p:288-297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.