IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v55y2011i1p498-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practical simulation and estimation for Gibbs Delaunay-Voronoi tessellations with geometric hardcore interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Dereudre, D.
  • Lavancier, F.

Abstract

General models of Gibbs Delaunay-Voronoi tessellations, which can be viewed as extensions of Ord's process, are considered. The interaction may occur on each cell of the tessellation and between neighbour cells. The tessellation may also be subjected to a geometric hardcore interaction, forcing the cells not to be too large, too small, or too flat. This setting, natural for applications, introduces some theoretical difficulties since the interaction is not necessarily hereditary. Mathematical results available for studying these models are reviewed and further outcomes are provided. They concern the existence, the simulation and the estimation of such tessellations. Based on these results, tools to handle these objects in practice are presented: how to simulate them, estimate their parameters and validate the fitted model. Some examples of simulated tessellations are studied in detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Dereudre, D. & Lavancier, F., 2011. "Practical simulation and estimation for Gibbs Delaunay-Voronoi tessellations with geometric hardcore interaction," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 498-519, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:1:p:498-519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00219-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Baddeley & R. Turner & J. Møller & M. Hazelton, 2005. "Residual analysis for spatial point processes (with discussion)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 617-666, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Löcherbach, Eva & Orlandi, Enza, 2011. "Neighborhood radius estimation for variable-neighborhood random fields," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 121(9), pages 2151-2185, September.
    2. F. Seitl & L. Petrich & J. Staněk & C. E. Krill & V. Schmidt & V. Beneš, 2021. "Exploration of Gibbs-Laguerre Tessellations for Three-Dimensional Stochastic Modeling," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 669-693, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tonglin Zhang & Ge Lin, 2009. "Cluster Detection Based on Spatial Associations and Iterated Residuals in Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 353-360, June.
    2. Heinrich Lothar & Klein Stella, 2011. "Central limit theorem for the integrated squared error of the empirical second-order product density and goodness-of-fit tests for stationary point processes," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 28(4), pages 359-387, December.
    3. D'Angelo, Nicoletta & Adelfio, Giada & Mateu, Jorge, 2023. "Locally weighted minimum contrast estimation for spatio-temporal log-Gaussian Cox processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Andrew J Edelman, 2012. "Positive Interactions between Desert Granivores: Localized Facilitation of Harvester Ants by Kangaroo Rats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-9, February.
    5. Amanda S. Hering & Sean Bair, 2014. "Characterizing spatial and chronological target selection of serial offenders," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 123-140, January.
    6. Coeurjolly, Jean-François, 2015. "Almost sure behavior of functionals of stationary Gibbs point processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 241-246.
    7. Coeurjolly, Jean-François & Reynaud-Bouret, Patricia, 2019. "A concentration inequality for inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott point processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 30-34.
    8. Tonglin Zhang & Ge Lin, 2008. "Identification of local clusters for count data: a model-based Moran's I test," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 293-306.
    9. Jean-François Coeurjolly, 2017. "Median-based estimation of the intensity of a spatial point process," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(2), pages 303-331, April.
    10. Shaochuan Lu, 2012. "Markov modulated Poisson process associated with state-dependent marks and its applications to the deep earthquakes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(1), pages 87-106, February.
    11. Daniel, Jeffrey & Horrocks, Julie & Umphrey, Gary J., 2018. "Penalized composite likelihoods for inhomogeneous Gibbs point process models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 104-116.
    12. Lothar Heinrich & Stella Klein, 2014. "Central limit theorems for empirical product densities of stationary point processes," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 121-138, July.
    13. Kenneth A. Flagg & Andrew Hoegh & John J. Borkowski, 2020. "Modeling Partially Surveyed Point Process Data: Inferring Spatial Point Intensity of Geomagnetic Anomalies," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(2), pages 186-205, June.
    14. A. Baddeley & J. Møller & A. Pakes, 2008. "Properties of residuals for spatial point processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 60(3), pages 627-649, September.
    15. Nicoletta D’Angelo & Marianna Siino & Antonino D’Alessandro & Giada Adelfio, 2022. "Local spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes for seismic data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(4), pages 633-671, December.
    16. Yongtao Guan, 2008. "Variance estimation for statistics computed from inhomogeneous spatial point processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 175-190, February.
    17. Janine B. Illian & David F. R. P. Burslem, 2017. "Improving the usability of spatial point process methodology: an interdisciplinary dialogue between statistics and ecology," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 495-520, October.
    18. Giada Adelfio & Marcello Chiodi, 2021. "Including covariates in a space-time point process with application to seismicity," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 947-971, September.
    19. Yehua Li & Yongtao Guan, 2014. "Functional Principal Component Analysis of Spatiotemporal Point Processes With Applications in Disease Surveillance," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 1205-1215, September.
    20. Ian W. Renner & David I. Warton, 2013. "Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson Point Process Models for Species Distribution Modeling in Ecology," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 274-281, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:1:p:498-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.