IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v51y2006i3p1848-1861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hierarchical modeling approach for risk assessment in developmental toxicity studies

Author

Listed:
  • Faes, Christel
  • Geys, Helena
  • Aerts, Marc
  • Molenberghs, Geert

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Faes, Christel & Geys, Helena & Aerts, Marc & Molenberghs, Geert, 2006. "A hierarchical modeling approach for risk assessment in developmental toxicity studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1848-1861, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:51:y:2006:i:3:p:1848-1861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(05)00316-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Catalano & Louise Ryan & Daniel Scharfstein, 1994. "Modeling Fetal Death and Malformation in Developmental Toxicity Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 629-637, August.
    2. Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2003. "A generalized estimating equation approach to modelling foetal response in developmental toxicity studies when the number of implants is dose dependent," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(1), pages 51-61, January.
    3. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    4. David B. Dunson & Zhen Chen & Jean Harry, 2003. "A Bayesian Approach for Joint Modeling of Cluster Size and Subunit-Specific Outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 521-530, September.
    5. Ronald J. Bosch & David Wypij & Louise M. Ryan, 1996. "A Semiparametric Approach to Risk Assessment for Quantitative Outcomes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(5), pages 657-665, October.
    6. Andrew S. Allen & Huiman X. Barnhart, 2002. "Joint Models for Toxicology Studies with Dose‐Dependent Number of Implantations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 1165-1173, December.
    7. John M. Williamson & Somnath Datta & Glen A. Satten, 2003. "Marginal Analyses of Clustered Data When Cluster Size Is Informative," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 36-42, March.
    8. Patrick Royston & Douglas G. Altman, 1994. "Regression Using Fractional Polynomials of Continuous Covariates: Parsimonious Parametric Modelling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 43(3), pages 429-453, September.
    9. Molenberghs, Geert & Declerck, Lieven & Aerts, Marc, 1998. "Misspecifying the likelihood for clustered binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 327-349, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin‐Zhu Yu & Hiba Baroud, 2019. "Quantifying Community Resilience Using Hierarchical Bayesian Kernel Methods: A Case Study on Recovery from Power Outages," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1930-1948, September.
    2. Ander Wilson & David M. Reif & Brian J. Reich, 2014. "Hierarchical dose–response modeling for high-throughput toxicity screening of environmental chemicals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 237-246, March.
    3. Kassandra Fronczyk & Athanasios Kottas, 2017. "Risk Assessment for Toxicity Experiments with Discrete and Continuous Outcomes: A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 585-601, December.
    4. Julie S. Najita & Yi Li & Paul J. Catalano, 2009. "A novel application of a bivariate regression model for binary and continuous outcomes to studies of fetal toxicity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(4), pages 555-573, September.
    5. Pryseley, Assam & Tchonlafi, Clotaire & Verbeke, Geert & Molenberghs, Geert, 2011. "Estimating negative variance components from Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: A mixed models approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1071-1085, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen Pang & Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2007. "Test of Marginal Compatibility and Smoothing Methods for Exchangeable Binary Data with Unequal Cluster Sizes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 218-227, March.
    2. Jaakko Nevalainen & Somnath Datta & Hannu Oja, 2014. "Inference on the marginal distribution of clustered data with informative cluster size," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 71-92, February.
    3. Chun Yin Lee & Kin Yau Wong & Kwok Fai Lam & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2023. "A semiparametric joint model for cluster size and subunit‐specific interval‐censored outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2010-2022, September.
    4. Marc Aerts & Niel Hens & Jeffrey Simonoff, 2010. "Model selection in regression based on pre-smoothing," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 1455-1472.
    5. Xiaoyun Li & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Stuart Lipsitz & Debajyoti Sinha, 2011. "Likelihood Methods for Binary Responses of Present Components in a Cluster," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 629-635, June.
    6. Shaun R. Seaman & Menelaos Pavlou & Andrew J. Copas, 2014. "Methods for observed-cluster inference when cluster size is informative: A review and clarifications," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 449-456, June.
    7. Matthew W. Wheeler & A. John Bailer, 2009. "Benchmark Dose Estimation Incorporating Multiple Data Sources," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 249-256, February.
    8. Reem Aljarallah & Samer A Kharroubi, 2021. "Use of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods to Model Kuwait Medical Genetic Center Data: An Application to Down Syndrome and Mental Retardation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, January.
    9. Claudia Czado & Anette Heyn & Gernot Müller, 2011. "Modeling individual migraine severity with autoregressive ordered probit models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 20(1), pages 101-121, March.
    10. Glen McGee & Marianthi‐Anna Kioumourtzoglou & Marc G. Weisskopf & Sebastien Haneuse & Brent A. Coull, 2020. "On the interplay between exposure misclassification and informative cluster size," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1209-1226, November.
    11. Gosoniu, L. & Vounatsou, P. & Sogoba, N. & Maire, N. & Smith, T., 2009. "Mapping malaria risk in West Africa using a Bayesian nonparametric non-stationary model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3358-3371, July.
    12. Noémi Kreif & Richard Grieve & Iván Díaz & David Harrison, 2015. "Evaluation of the Effect of a Continuous Treatment: A Machine Learning Approach with an Application to Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(9), pages 1213-1228, September.
    13. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Bansal, Prateek & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2021. "A new spatial count data model with time-varying parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 566-586.
    14. Mumtaz, Haroon & Theodoridis, Konstantinos, 2017. "Common and country specific economic uncertainty," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 205-216.
    15. Jesse Elliott & Zemin Bai & Shu-Ching Hsieh & Shannon E Kelly & Li Chen & Becky Skidmore & Said Yousef & Carine Zheng & David J Stewart & George A Wells, 2020. "ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    17. Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo, 2012. "Life Satisfaction, Household Income and Personality Traits," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 988, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    18. Francois Olivier & Laval Guillaume, 2011. "Deviance Information Criteria for Model Selection in Approximate Bayesian Computation," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, July.
    19. Raggi, Davide & Bordignon, Silvano, 2012. "Long memory and nonlinearities in realized volatility: A Markov switching approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3730-3742.
    20. Angelica Gianfreda & Francesco Ravazzolo & Luca Rossini, 2023. "Large Time‐Varying Volatility Models for Hourly Electricity Prices," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 85(3), pages 545-573, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:51:y:2006:i:3:p:1848-1861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.