IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v193y2024ics016794732300227x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-clustering difference testing: Valid inference and practical considerations with applications to ecological and biological data

Author

Listed:
  • Hivert, Benjamin
  • Agniel, Denis
  • Thiébaut, Rodolphe
  • Hejblum, Boris P.

Abstract

Clustering is part of unsupervised analysis methods that group samples into homogeneous and separate subgroups of observations also called clusters. To interpret the clusters, statistical hypothesis testing is often used to infer the variables that significantly separate the estimated clusters from each other. However, data-driven hypotheses are thus used for the inference process because the hypotheses are derived from the clustering results. This double use of the data leads traditional hypothesis test to fail to control the Type I error rate particularly because of uncertainty in the clustering process and the potential artificial differences it could create. Three novel statistical hypothesis tests are introduced, each designed to account for the clustering process. These tests efficiently control the Type I error rate by identifying only variables that contain a true signal separating groups of observations. The proposed tests were applied in two distinct contexts: animal ecology and immunology, demonstrating the relevance of the results with real datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Hivert, Benjamin & Agniel, Denis & Thiébaut, Rodolphe & Hejblum, Boris P., 2024. "Post-clustering difference testing: Valid inference and practical considerations with applications to ecological and biological data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:193:y:2024:i:c:s016794732300227x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2023.107916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016794732300227X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2023.107916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:193:y:2024:i:c:s016794732300227x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.