IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v113y2017icp125-135.html

Model-based clustering for assessing the prognostic value of imaging biomarkers and mixed type tests

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zheyu
  • Sebestyen, Krisztian
  • Monsell, Sarah E.

Abstract

A model-based clustering method is proposed to address two research aims in Alzheimer’s disease (AD): to evaluate the accuracy of imaging biomarkers in AD prognosis, and to integrate biomarker information and standard clinical test results into the diagnoses. One challenge in such biomarker studies is that it is often desired or necessary to conduct the evaluation without relying on clinical diagnoses or some other standard references. This is because (1) biomarkers may provide prognostic information long before any standard reference can be acquired; (2) these references are often based on or provide unfair advantage to standard tests. Therefore, they can mask the prognostic value of a useful biomarker, especially when the biomarker is much more accurate than the standard tests. In addition, the biomarkers and existing tests may be of mixed type and vastly different distributions. A model-based clustering method based on finite mixture modeling framework is introduced. The model allows for the inclusion of mixed typed manifest variables with possible differential covariates to evaluate the prognostic value of biomarkers in addition to standard tests without relying on potentially inaccurate reference diagnoses. Maximum likelihood parameter estimation is carried out via the EM algorithm. Accuracy measures and the ROC curves of the biomarkers are derived subsequently. Finally, the method is illustrated with a real example in AD.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zheyu & Sebestyen, Krisztian & Monsell, Sarah E., 2017. "Model-based clustering for assessing the prognostic value of imaging biomarkers and mixed type tests," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 125-135.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:113:y:2017:i:c:p:125-135
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947316302614
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard J. Cook & Edmund T. M. Ng & Maureen O. Meade, 2000. "Estimation of Operating Characteristics for Dependent Diagnostic Tests Based on Latent Markov Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1109-1117, December.
    2. R. Mark Henkelman & Ian Kay & Michael J. Bronskill, 1990. "Receiver Operator characteristic (ROC) Analysis without Truth," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 10(1), pages 24-29, February.
    3. G. Jones & W. O. Johnson & W. D. Vink & N. French, 2012. "A Framework for the Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Diagnostic Outcome Data and Latent Infection Status: Application to Investigating the Temporal Relationship between Infection and Disease," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 371-379, June.
    4. Huiping Xu & Bruce A. Craig, 2009. "A Probit Latent Class Model with General Correlation Structures for Evaluating Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1145-1155, December.
    5. Ravi Varadhan & Christophe Roland, 2008. "Simple and Globally Convergent Methods for Accelerating the Convergence of Any EM Algorithm," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 35(2), pages 335-353, June.
    6. Forcina, Antonio, 2008. "Identifiability of extended latent class models with individual covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5263-5268, August.
    7. Zhenke Wu & Maria Deloria-Knoll & Laura L. Hammitt & Scott L. Zeger, 2016. "Partially latent class models for case–control studies of childhood pneumonia aetiology," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 97-114, January.
    8. Geoffrey Jones & Wesley O. Johnson & Timothy E. Hanson & Ronald Christensen, 2010. "Identifiability of Models for Multiple Diagnostic Testing in the Absence of a Gold Standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 855-863, September.
    9. Paul S. Albert & Lori E. Dodd, 2004. "A Cautionary Note on the Robustness of Latent Class Models for Estimating Diagnostic Error without a Gold Standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 427-435, June.
    10. Yingye Zheng & William E. Barlow & Gary Cutter, 2005. "Assessing Accuracy of Mammography in the Presence of Verification Bias and Intrareader Correlation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 259-268, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. Jones & W. O. Johnson & W. D. Vink & N. French, 2012. "A Framework for the Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Diagnostic Outcome Data and Latent Infection Status: Application to Investigating the Temporal Relationship between Infection and Disease," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 371-379, June.
    2. Leandro García Barrado & Els Coart & Tomasz Burzykowski, 2017. "Estimation of diagnostic accuracy of a combination of continuous biomarkers allowing for conditional dependence between the biomarkers and the imperfect reference-test," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 646-655, June.
    3. Clara Drew & Moses Badio & Dehkontee Dennis & Lisa Hensley & Elizabeth Higgs & Michael Sneller & Mosoka Fallah & Cavan Reilly, 2023. "Simplifying the estimation of diagnostic testing accuracy over time for high specificity tests in the absence of a gold standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1546-1558, June.
    4. Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere & Kevin Wilson & Sara Graziadio & Luke Vale & A Joy Allen, 2019. "Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Huiping Xu & Xiaochun Li & Zuoyi Zhang & Shaun Grannis, 2022. "Score test for assessing the conditional dependence in latent class models and its application to record linkage," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1663-1687, November.
    6. Daniel Oberski & Geert Kollenburg & Jeroen Vermunt, 2013. "A Monte Carlo evaluation of three methods to detect local dependence in binary data latent class models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 7(3), pages 267-279, September.
    7. Bruce D. Spencer, 2012. "When Do Latent Class Models Overstate Accuracy for Diagnostic and Other Classifiers in the Absence of a Gold Standard?," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 559-566, June.
    8. Allassonnière, Stéphanie & Chevallier, Juliette, 2021. "A new class of stochastic EM algorithms. Escaping local maxima and handling intractable sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Paul S. Albert, 2007. "Random Effects Modeling Approaches for Estimating ROC Curves from Repeated Ordinal Tests without a Gold Standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 593-602, June.
    10. Greg Lewis & Bora Ozaltun & Georgios Zervas, 2021. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Differentiated Products Demand Systems," Papers 2111.12397, arXiv.org.
    11. Jurgen A. Doornik, 2018. "Accelerated Estimation of Switching Algorithms: The Cointegrated VAR Model and Other Applications," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 45(2), pages 283-300, June.
    12. O’Neill, Donal, 2015. "Measuring obesity in the absence of a gold standard," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 116-128.
    13. Galina Williams, 2015. "Households Willingness to Pay for the Emissions Reduction Policy, Queensland, Australia," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440156, September.
    14. Zhou, Wei & Zhong, Guang-Yan & Li, Jiang-Cheng, 2022. "Stability of financial market driven by information delay and liquidity in delay agent-based model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).
    15. Dardanoni, Valentino & Li Donni, Paolo, 2012. "Incentive and selection effects of Medigap insurance on inpatient care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 457-470.
    16. Yue, Chen & Chen, Shaojie & Sair, Haris I. & Airan, Raag & Caffo, Brian S., 2015. "Estimating a graphical intra-class correlation coefficient (GICC) using multivariate probit-linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 126-133.
    17. Robin, Stéphane & Scrucca, Luca, 2023. "Mixture-based estimation of entropy," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    18. Brett Hollenbeck & Kosuke Uetake, 2021. "Taxation and market power in the legal marijuana industry," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 52(3), pages 559-595, September.
    19. Christopher S. McMahan & Joshua M. Tebbs & Timothy E. Hanson & Christopher R. Bilder, 2017. "Bayesian regression for group testing data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1443-1452, December.
    20. Xifen Huang & Jinfeng Xu & Yunpeng Zhou, 2022. "Profile and Non-Profile MM Modeling of Cluster Failure Time and Analysis of ADNI Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:113:y:2017:i:c:p:125-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.