IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v89y2016icp47-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An improved TOPSIS with weighted hesitant vague information

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Shenghan
  • Liu, Wei
  • Chang, Wenbing

Abstract

The selection of the best alternatives in project management has attracted increasing attention due to the uncertain environment. Vague TOPSIS is one of the powerful methods to solve this problem. In this work, firstly, a method of measuring the similarities of vague set which can take the uncertainty preference into account is raised and comparison between methods has been made to verify its effectiveness. Then, a vague set based TOPSIS in group decision is proposed to aid the decision making in project management. In this method, the weights of the experts for different criteria in the group decision are completely unknown and are calculated with the similarities of the judgments by them in the project. Finally, a computation example is shown to illustrate the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Shenghan & Liu, Wei & Chang, Wenbing, 2016. "An improved TOPSIS with weighted hesitant vague information," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 47-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:89:y:2016:i:c:p:47-53
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2015.09.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077915002970
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.09.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guangquan Zhang & Jie Lu, 2003. "An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method Dealing with Fuzzy Preferences for Alternatives and Individual Judgments for Selection Criteria," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 501-515, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejiang Luo & Su He & Hao Wu & Long Cheng & Junbo Li, 2023. "An Integrated Approach to Green Mines Based on Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS: Green Degree Analysis and Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Lean & Wang, Shouyang & Lai, Kin Keung, 2009. "An intelligent-agent-based fuzzy group decision making model for financial multicriteria decision support: The case of credit scoring," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 942-959, June.
    2. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    3. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    4. Zaiwu Gong & Lihong Wang, 2017. "On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Ron Chi-Wai Kwok & Duanning Zhou & Quan Zhang & Jian Ma, 2007. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for IS Student Group Project Assessment," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 25-42, January.
    6. İrfan Ertuğrul, 2011. "Fuzzy Group Decision Making for the Selection of Facility Location," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 725-740, November.
    7. Chiu-Chi Wei & Chih-Chien Tai & Shun-Chin Lee & Meng-Ling Chang, 2023. "Assessing Knowledge Quality Using Fuzzy MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Ahmet Aytekin & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2017. "Analyzing Financial Performance Of Insurance Companies Traded In BIST via Fuzzy Shannon's Entropy Based Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 5(1), pages 51-84, June.
    9. Tseng, Ming-Lang & Lim, Ming K. & Wu, Kuo-Jui, 2019. "Improving the benefits and costs on sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 308-321.
    10. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Ching-Chien Yang & Jun-Der Leu & Ya-Fen Lee & Chih-Hao Yang, 2013. "An Integrated Group Decision Making Support Model for Corporate Financing Decisions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1103-1127, November.
    11. Ana X. Halabi & Jairo R. Montoya-Torres & Nelson Obregón, 2012. "A Case Study of Group Decision Method for Environmental Foresight and Water Resources Planning Using a Fuzzy Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 205-232, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:89:y:2016:i:c:p:47-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.